Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 5;225(1):75-83.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa132.

Dengue Endemicity, Force of Infection, and Variation in Transmission Intensity in 13 Endemic Countries

Affiliations

Dengue Endemicity, Force of Infection, and Variation in Transmission Intensity in 13 Endemic Countries

Joshua Nealon et al. J Infect Dis. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Dengue endemicity varies but comparative, multicountry data are extremely limited. An improved understanding is needed to prioritize prevention, including vaccination, which is currently recommended only under specific epidemiological conditions. We used serological study data from 46 geographical sites in 13 countries to estimate dengue force of infection (FOI, the proportion of children seroconverting per year) under assumptions of either age-constant or age-varying FOI, and the age at which 50% and 80% of children had been infected. After exclusions, 13 661 subjects were included. Estimated constant FOI varied widely, from 1.7% (Singapore) to 24.1% (the Philippines). In the site-level analysis 44 sites (96%) reached 50% seroconversion and 35 sites (75%) reached 80% seroconversion by age 18 years, with significant heterogeneity. These findings confirm that children living in dengue-endemic countries receive intense early dengue exposure, increasing risk of secondary infection, and imply serosurveys at fine spatial resolutions are needed to inform vaccination campaigns.

Keywords: dengue; endemicity; epidemiology; infectious disease transmission; seroprevalence; vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow chart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Observed seroprevalence by age (circles) and 95% confidence interval (CI), adjusted for clustering (spikes) and estimate seroprevalence assuming constant force of infection (FOI) (solid line) and 95% CIs (shaded area). Dotted lines correspond to estimated seroprevalence under an assumption of age-varying FOI.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Age of 80% seroconversion by site, estimated from best-fitting constant (circles) or age-varying (diamonds) models. Symbol size corresponds to frequency weights. ≥19 signifies estimates were outside the range of our data.

References

    1. Murray NE, Quam MB, Wilder-Smith A. Epidemiology of dengue: past, present and future prospects. Clin Epidemiol 2013; 5:299–309. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, et al. . The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 2013; 496:504–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shepard DS, Undurraga EA, Halasa YA, Stanaway JD. The global economic burden of dengue: a systematic analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16:935–41. - PubMed
    1. GBD 2016 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390:1151–210. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lover AA, Buchy P, Rachline A, et al. . Spatial epidemiology and climatic predictors of paediatric dengue infections captured via sentinel site surveillance, Phnom Penh Cambodia 2011–2012. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:658. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types