kinetics and energy contribution in simulated maximal performance during short and middle distance-trials in swimming
- PMID: 32212025
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04348-y
kinetics and energy contribution in simulated maximal performance during short and middle distance-trials in swimming
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to analyze swimmers' oxygen uptake kinetics (K) and bioenergetic profiles in 50, 100, and 200 m simulated swimming events and determine which physiological variables relate with performance.
Methods: Twenty-eight well-trained swimmers completed an incremental test for maximal oxygen uptake (Peak-) and maximal aerobic velocity (MAV) assessment. Maximal trials (MT) of 50, 100, and 200-m in front crawl swimming were performed for K and bioenergetic profile. K parameters were calculated through monoexponential modeling and by a new growth rate method. The recovery phase was used along with the blood lactate concentration for bioenergetics profiling.
Results: Peak- (57.47 ± 5.7 ml kg-1 min-1 for male and 53.53 ± 4.21 ml kg-1 min-1 for female) did not differ from peak attained at the 200-MT for female and at the 100 and 200-MT for male. From the 50-MT to 100-MT and to the 200-MT the K presented slower time constants (8.6 ± 2.3 s, 11.5 ± 2.4 s and 16.7 ± 5.5 s, respectively), the aerobic contribution increased (~ 34%, 54% and 71%, respectively) and the anaerobic decreased (~ 66%, 46% and 29%, respectively), presenting a cross-over in the 100-MT. Both energy systems, MAV, Peak-, and peak of the MT's were correlated with swimming performance.
Discussion: The aerobic energy contribution is an important factor for performance in 50, 100, and 200-m, regardless of the time taken to adjust the absolute oxidative response, when considering the effect on a mixed-group regarding sex. K speeding could be explained by a faster initial pacing strategy used in the shorter distances, that contributed for a more rapid increase of the oxidative contribution to the energy turnover.
Keywords: Energy system contribution; Maximal trials; Oxygen uptake kinetics; Rate of adjustment of; Swimming.
References
-
- Bailey SJ, Wilkerson DP, DiMenna FJ, Jones AM (2009) Influence of repeated sprint training on pulmonary O2 uptake and muscle deoxygenation kinetics in humans. J Appl Physiol 106(6):1875–1887 - PubMed
-
- Baldari C, Fernandes R, Meucci M, Ribeiro J, Vilas-Boas JP, Guidetti L (2012) Is the new aquatrainer® snorkel valid for [Formula: see text] assessment in swimming? Int J Sports Med 34(04):336–344 - PubMed
-
- Beneke R, Pollmann C, Bleif I, Leithäuser RM, Hütler M (2002) How anaerobic is the Wingate anaerobic test for humans? Eur J Appl Physiol 87:338–392
-
- Bentley DJ, Roels B, Hellard P, Fauquet C, Libicz S, Millet GP (2005) Physiological responses during submaximal interval swimming training: effects of interval duration. J Sci Med Sport 8:392–402 - PubMed
-
- Berger NJ, Tolfrey K, Williams AG, Jones AM (2006) Influence of continuous and interval training on oxygen uptake on-kinetics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38(3):504–512 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- SFRH/BD/73022/2010/Foundation for Science and Technology
- UIDB/00447/2020/CIPER-Foundation for Science and Technology
- UIDP/04748/2020/CIEQV-Foundation for Science and Technology
- CNPq; 479262/2013-6/Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
- FAPESP 2016-04544-3/Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous