Multiple myeloma: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management
- PMID: 32212178
- DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25791
Multiple myeloma: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management
Erratum in
-
Erratum.Am J Hematol. 2020 Nov;95(11):1444. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25876. Epub 2020 Jun 16. Am J Hematol. 2020. PMID: 33464646 No abstract available.
Abstract
Disease overview: Multiple myeloma accounts for approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies.
Diagnosis: The diagnosis requires ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events (MDE) namely CRAB (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or lytic bone lesions) features felt related to the plasma cell disorder, bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥60%, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥100 (provided involved FLC is ≥100 mg/L), or >1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Risk stratification: The presence of del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain 1q, or p53 mutation is considered high-risk multiple myeloma. Presence of any two high risk factors is considered double-hit myeloma; three or more high risk factors is triple-hit myeloma.
Risk-adapted initial therapy: In transplant eligible patients, induction therapy consists of bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) given for approximately 3-4 cycles followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In high-risk patients, daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (Dara-VRd) is an alternative to VRd. Selected standard risk patients can get additional cycles of induction, and delay transplant until first relapse. Patients not candidates for transplant are typically treated with VRd for approximately 8-12 cycles followed by lenalidomide; alternatively these patients can be treated with daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (DRd).
Maintenance therapy: After ASCT, standard risk patients need lenalidomide maintenance, while bortezomib-based maintenance is needed for patients with high-risk myeloma.
Management of refractory disease: Most patients require a triplet regimen at relapse, with the choice of regimen varying with each successive relapse.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group Updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e538-e548.
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7-30.
-
- Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, Larson DR, Plevak MF, Melton LJ 3rd. Incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County, Minnesota: trend over 6 decades. Cancer. 2004;101:2667-2674.
-
- Landgren O, Weiss BM. Patterns of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma in various ethnic/racial groups: support for genetic factors in pathogenesis. Leukemia. 2009;23:1691-1697.
-
- Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Witzig TE, et al. Review of 1,027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2003;78:21-33.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous