Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;24(4):e13707.
doi: 10.1111/petr.13707. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

Impact of mechanical circulatory support on survival in pediatric heart transplantation

Affiliations

Impact of mechanical circulatory support on survival in pediatric heart transplantation

Sonia Marcos-Alonso et al. Pediatr Transplant. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Evidence on the impact of MCS on pediatric heart transplant survival is still scarce related to congenital heart disease patients including univentricular physiology as well as the risk factors for complications. We performed a retrospective review of all urgent pediatric (aged ≤16 years) HT from 2004 to 2014 in the Spanish Pediatric Heart Transplant Registry Group. Patients were stratified into two groups: urgent 0 (MCS at HT) and urgent 1 (non-MCS at HT). The primary outcome measure was post-transplant survival; secondary outcome measures were complications and absence of infections and rejection during the first post-transplant year. One hundred twenty-one pediatric patients underwent urgent HT, 58 (47.9%) urgent 0 and 63 (52%) urgent 1. There were 30 (24.8%) deaths: 12 in the urgent 0 group and 18 in the urgent 1 group, P = n.s. Regarding the type of MCS, patients on ECMO had the highest rate of complications (80%) and mortality (40%). Patients in the urgent 1 group showed a higher risk of hospital re-admission for infection during the first year after transplantation (OR 2.31 [1.1-4.82]), P = .025. We did not identify a risk factor for mortality. MCS does not impact negatively on survival after HT. However, there is a significant increase in 30-day and 1-year mortality and complications in ECMO patients compared with VAD patients. Infants, congenital heart disease, and PediMACS were not found to be risk factors for mortality.

Keywords: bridge to heart transplant; mechanical circulatory support; pediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Botha P, Solana R, Cassidy J, et al. The impact of mechanical circulatory support on outcomes in paediatric heart transplantation. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2013;44:836-840.
    1. Rosenthal DN, Almond C, Jaquiss RD, et al. Adverse events in children implanted with ventricular assist devices in the United States: data from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS). J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:569-577.
    1. Rossano JW, Lorts A, VanderPluym CJ, et al. Outcomes of pediatric patients supported with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices: a report from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:585-590.
    1. Mansfield RT, Lin KY, Zaoutis T, et al. The use of pediatric ventricular assist devices in Children's Hospitals from 2000-2010: morbidity, mortality and hospital charges. Pediatric Crit Care Med. 2015;16(6):522-528.
    1. De Rita F, Hasan A, Haynes S, et al. Mechanical cardiac support in children with congenital heart disease with intention to bridge to heart transplantation. Eur J Card-Thorac Surg. 2014;46:656-662.

LinkOut - more resources