Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Mar 25;10(1):5397.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62261-y.

Rosuvastatin alters the genetic composition of the human gut microbiome

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Rosuvastatin alters the genetic composition of the human gut microbiome

Martin Kummen et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The gut microbiome contributes to the variation of blood lipid levels, and secondary bile acids are associated with the effect of statins. Yet, our knowledge of how statins, one of our most common drug groups, affect the human microbiome is scarce. We aimed to characterize the effect of rosuvastatin on gut microbiome composition and inferred genetic content in stool samples from a randomized controlled trial (n = 66). No taxa were significantly altered by rosuvastatin during the study. However, rosuvastatin-treated participants showed a reduction in the collective genetic potential to transport and metabolize precursors of the pro-atherogenic metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO, p < 0.01), and an increase of related metabolites betaine and γ-butyrobetaine in plasma (p < 0.01). Exploratory analyses in the rosuvastatin group showed that participants with the least favorable treatment response (defined as < median change in high-density/low-density lipoprotein (HDL/LDL) ratio) showed a marked increase in TMAO-levels compared to those with a more favorable response (p < 0.05). Our data suggest that while rosuvastatin has a limited effect on gut microbiome composition, it could exert broader collective effects on the microbiome relevant to their function, providing a rationale for further studies of the influence of statins on the gut microbiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A trend towards increased gut microbial richness in participants receiving rosuvastatin. Participants on rosuvastatin treatment showed an increase in gut microbial richness (delta Chao1, paired t-test p = 0.04), but this increase was not statistically significant compared with the placebo group (PGLM = 0.22). A similar trend was detected for Phylogenetic diversity, while the change in Shannon diversity index was similar in the rosuvastatin and the placebo group. Data shown as mean ±95% CI. Paired t-test from baseline and study-end within the same study group, denoted p. Comparison of change between the study groups using repeated measures ANOVA from baseline and study-end, denoted PGLM. Values at 4 weeks missing for n = 1 in each group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Functions (KEGG Orthologs) in the gut microbiota related to cellular transport and metabolism along the choline/betaine-trimethylamine (TMA) metabolic pathway are affected by rosuvastatin treatment. Data are shown as mean ±95% CI. Repeated measures ANOVA from baseline and study-end, denoted PGLM. Values at four weeks missing for n = 1 in each group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in microbiome-related metabolites in peripheral blood during rosuvastatin treatment. (a) Rosuvastatin increase precursors of the microbiota dependent metabolite trimethylamine (TMA) in plasma. (b) TMA is metabolized to the pro-atherogenic metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) in the liver, which is not affected by rosuvastatin. (c) Participants with the least favorable treatment response (defined as below median change in high density to low density lipoprotein (HDL/LDL) ratio) show a marked increase in TMAO levels compared to those with a more favorable response. All randomized participants with serum samples available were included in the analysis, irrespective of the availability of microbiome data. TMAO values missing for n = 2 in panel C. Data shown as mean ±95% CI. Repeated measures ANOVA, denoted PGLM.

References

    1. Endo A. A gift from nature: the birth of the statins. Nat. Med. 2008;14:1050–1052. doi: 10.1038/nm1008-1050. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walley T, Folino-Gallo P, Schwabe U, van Ganse E. Variations and increase in use of statins across Europe: data from administrative databases. BMJ. 2004;328:385–386. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.385. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Newman CB, et al. Statin Safety and Associated Adverse Events: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019;39:e38–e81. doi: 10.1161/ATV.0000000000000073. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mihos CG, Artola RT, Santana O. The pleiotropic effects of the hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors in rheumatologic disorders: a comprehensive review. Rheumatol. Int. 2012;32:287–294. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2008-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khan TJ, et al. Effect of atorvastatin on the gut microbiota of high fat diet-induced hypercholesterolemic rats. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:662. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-19013-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances