Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May;104(10):4281-4288.
doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10542-x. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

Methods for detection of viable foodborne pathogens: current state-of-art and future prospects

Affiliations
Review

Methods for detection of viable foodborne pathogens: current state-of-art and future prospects

Antonio C G Foddai et al. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 May.

Abstract

The ability to rapidly detect viable pathogens in food is important for public health and food safety reasons. Culture-based detection methods, the traditional means of demonstrating microbial viability, tend to be laborious, time consuming and slow to provide results. Several culture-independent methods to detect viable pathogens have been reported in recent years, including both nucleic acid-based (PCR combined with use of cell viability dyes or reverse-transcriptase PCR to detect messenger RNA) and phage-based (plaque assay or phage amplification and lysis plus PCR/qPCR, immunoassay or enzymatic assay to detect host DNA, progeny phages or intracellular components) methods. Some of these newer methods, particularly phage-based methods, show promise in terms of speed, sensitivity of detection and cost compared with culture for food testing. This review provides an overview of these new approaches and their food testing applications, and discusses their current limitations and future prospects in relation to detection of viable pathogens in food. KEY POINTS: • Cultural methods may be 'gold standard' for assessing viability of pathogens, but they are too slow. • Nucleic acid-based methods offer speed of detection but not consistently proof of cell viability. • Phage-based methods appear to offer best alternative to culture for detecting viable pathogens.

Keywords: Cell viability; Detection methods; Foodborne pathogens; Rapid methods; Viable-but-non-culturable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Alcaine SD, Tilton L, Serrano MA, Wang M, Vachet RW, Nugen SR. Phage-protease-peptide: a novel trifecta enabling multiplex detection of viable bacterial pathogens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:8177–8185. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6867-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alcaine SD, Pacitto D, Sela DA, Nugen SR. Phage and phosphatase: a novel phage-based probe for rapid, multi-platform detection of bacteria. Analyst. 2015;140:7629–7636. doi: 10.1039/c5an01181g. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anany H, Brovko L, El Dougdoug NK, Sohar J, Fenn H, Alasiri N, Jabrane T. Print to detect: a rapid and ultrasensitive phage-based dipstick assay for foodborne pathogens. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410:1217–1230. doi: 10.1007/s00216-017-0597-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ayrapetyan M, Oliver JD. The viable but non-culturable state and its relevance in food safety. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2016;8:27–133. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2016.04.010. - DOI
    1. Baskaran SA, Kollanoor-Johny A, Nair MS, Venkitanarayanan K. Efficacy of plant-derived antimicrobials in controlling enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli virulence in vitro. J Food Prot. 2016;79:1965–1970. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-104. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources