Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Apr;27(2):165-174.
doi: 10.1007/s40292-020-00371-4. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

Central Blood Pressure Waves Assessment: A Validation Study of Non-invasive Aortic Pressure Measurement in Human Beings

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Central Blood Pressure Waves Assessment: A Validation Study of Non-invasive Aortic Pressure Measurement in Human Beings

Ramiro Sánchez et al. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Measurement of central (aortic) systolic blood pressure has been shown to provide reliable information to evaluate target organ damage. However, non-invasive central blood pressure measurement procedures are still under analysis.

Aim: To compare human pressure waveforms invasively obtained in the aorta, with the corresponding waveforms non-invasively recorded using an oscillometric device (Mobil-O-Graph).

Methods: In this research were included 20 subjects in which invasive percutaneous coronary interventions were performed. They were 10 males (68 ± 12 y. o.

, bmi: 27.4 ± 4.6 kg/m2) and 10 females (77 ± 8 y. o.

, bmi: 28.5 ± 5.3 kg/m2). During the invasive aortic pressure recording, a synchronized non-invasive Mobil-O-Graph acquisition beat by beat and reconstructed central pressure wave was performed. Both, invasive and non-invasive pressure waves were digitized and stored for subsequent analysis and calculations. A computerized interpolation procedure was developed in our laboratory to compare these pressure waves.

Results: A significant correlation between Mobil-O-Graph central blood pressure measurements and the corresponding invasive values was found in males (r < 0.81; p < 0.01) and females (r < 0.93; p < 0.01). However, in both genders, the slope of the regression lines was lesser than 1 (males: y = 0.7354x + 18.998; females: y = 0.9835x + 2.8432). In the whole population (n = 20), a significant correlation between Mobil-O-Graph central blood pressure measurements and the corresponding invasive values was found (r < 0.89; p < 0.01) and the regression line was lesser than 1 (y = 0.9774x + 1.7603).

Conclusions: In this research, a high correlation between invasive central blood pressure values and those measured with the Mobil-O-Graph device was found in males, females and the whole population. However, a sub estimation of Mobil-O-Graph central blood pressure values was observed.

Keywords: Aortic blood pressure; Aortic central pressure; Mobil-O-Graph; Validation analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hypertension. 2011 Nov;58(5):825-32 - PubMed
    1. J Hypertens. 2020 Feb;38(2):235-242 - PubMed
    1. Hypertens Res. 2007 Mar;30(3):219-28 - PubMed
    1. J Hum Hypertens. 2015 Jul;29(7):442-8 - PubMed
    1. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2018 Dec;25(4):415-416 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources