The association between breast cancer risk factors and background parenchymal enhancement at dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI
- PMID: 32216451
- PMCID: PMC7720360
- DOI: 10.1177/0284185120911583
The association between breast cancer risk factors and background parenchymal enhancement at dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI
Abstract
Background: Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of normal tissue at breast magnetic resonance imaging is suggested to be an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Its association with established risk factors for breast cancer is not fully investigated.
Purpose: To study the association between BPE and risk factors for breast cancer in a healthy, non-high-risk screening population.
Material and methods: We measured BPE and mammographic density and used data from self-reported questionnaires in 214 healthy women aged 43-74 years. We estimated odds ratios for the univariable association between BPE and risk factors. We then fitted an adjusted model using logistic regression to evaluate associations between BPE (high vs. low) and risk factors, including mammographic breast density.
Results: The majority of women had low BPE (84%). In a multivariable model, we found statistically significant associations between BPE and age (P = 0.002) and BMI (P = 0.03). We did find a significant association between systemic progesterone medication and BPE, but due to small numbers, the results should be interpreted with caution. The adjusted odds ratio for high BPE was 3.1 among women with density D (compared to B) and 2.1 for density C (compared to B). However, the association between high BPE and density was not statistically significant. We did not find statistically significant associations with any other risk factors.
Conclusion: Our study confirmed the known association of BPE with age and BMI. Although our results show a higher likelihood for high BPE with increasing levels of mammographic density, the association was not statistically significant.
Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; breast; epidemiology; primary neoplasms.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Giess CS, Yeh ED, Raza S, et al. Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging: normal patterns, diagnostic challenges, and potential for false-positive and false-negative interpretation. Radiographics 2014; 34:234–247. - PubMed
-
- King V, Gu Y, Kaplan JB, et al. Impact of menopausal status on background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:2641–2647. - PubMed
-
- Delille JP, Slanetz PJ, Yeh ED, et al. Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue. Breast J 2005; 11:236–241. - PubMed
-
- Muller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhauser K, Stoll P, et al. Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1997; 203:145–149. - PubMed
-
- Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J, et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 1997; 203:137–144. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical