Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 25;12(4):732.
doi: 10.3390/polym12040732.

Natural Compounds as Sustainable Additives for Biopolymers

Affiliations
Review

Natural Compounds as Sustainable Additives for Biopolymers

Nadka Tzankova Dintcheva et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

In the last few decades, the interest towards natural compounds, coming from a natural source and biodegradable, for biopolymers is always increasing because of a public request for the formulation of safe, eco-friendly, and sustainable materials. The main classes of natural compounds for biopolymers are: (i) naturally occurring fillers (nFil), such as nano-/micro- sized layered alumino-silicate: halloysite, bentonite, montmorillonite, hydroxyapatite, calcium carbonate, etc.; (ii) naturally occurring fibers (nFib), such as wood and vegetable fibers; (iii) naturally occurring antioxidant molecules (nAO), such as phenols, polyphenols, vitamins, and carotenoids. However, in this short review, the advantages and drawbacks, considering naturally occurring compounds as safe, eco-friendly, and sustainable additives for biopolymers, have been focused and discussed briefly, even taking into account the requests and needs of different application fields.

Keywords: biopolymers; natural antioxidants; natural fibers; natural fillers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The trend of published papers vs. publication year (Scopus data revelation in January 2020).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Structure of layered alumino-silicate and (b) intercalated (left) and exfoliated (right) morphology of layered alumino-silicate into polymer and biopolymer matrices [32], Reproduced with permission from Bayer G, Plast Addit Compound; published by Elsevier, 2002.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Storage modulus, E’, for (a) polylactic acid (PLA) and (b) PCL-based nanocomposite systems [37], Reproduced with permission from Fukushima K, Mater. Sci. Eng. C; published by Elsevier, 2009.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Sample deflection recorded during creep tests for the sample PLA (squares), polyamide 11 (PA11) (diamond), PLA70 (circles), and PLA70-silicate at 3 wt.% (triangles). (b,c) The pictures show the samples PLA70 and PLA70-silicate at the end of the test, that is, after the temperature had reached ≈160 °C [38], Reproduced with permission from Nuzzo A, Macromol. Mater. Eng.; published by Wiley, 2014.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of natural unmodified montmorillonite (Na-MMT) and organo-modified layered montmorillonite (OMMT) on mechanical properties: compressive strength (a), bending strength (b) and impact toughness (c) of PLA/polybutylene succinate (PBS) foams [40], Reproduced with permission Figure 2014.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Elongation at break (EB) and (b) Young’s modulus (E) of different samples without and with montmorillonite and compatilizing agent as a function of accelerated weathering exposure, using UV-B lamps (~313 nm). (c) energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) of Cloisite 15A [28], Reproduced with permission from Dintcheva NTz, Polym. Degrad. Stab.; published by Elsevier, 2009.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a) Schematic representation of the “tortuous path” model for nanocomposites. (b) Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of PLA nanocomposite containing 3 wt.% of montmorillonite, showing aligned clay platelets. (c) Water vapor transmission rates (WVTR) of PLA nanocomposites as a function of wt. nanofillers for two different PLA grades [41], Reproduced with permission from Duan Z, J. Membrane Sci.; published by Elsevier, 2013.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) Yield strength and (b) strain at break for poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) samples before and after 5 weeks of aging as a function of hydroxyapatite (nHA) content. (c) Mass loss and (d) degree of crystallinity for amorphous sample, as a function of the aging time for PLLA containing nHA at 0, 5, and 10 wt.% [42], Reproduced with permission from Delabarde C, Polym. Degrad. Stab.; published by Elsevier, 2011.
Figure 9
Figure 9
(a,b) Stress-strain curves of neat PLA and PLA containing hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticles modified with phosphorus-based organic additives [43], Reproduced with permission from Hajibeygi M, Polym. Adv. Technol.; published by Wiley, 2019.
Figure 10
Figure 10
TGA curves of the CaCO3-PLA bio-composites with various loading of CaCO3: (a) micro-CaCO3-1740; (b) nano-CaCO3-1041; (c) nano-CaCO3-280 [44], Reproduced with permission from Nekhamanuraka B, Energy Procedia; published by Elsevier, 2014.
Figure 11
Figure 11
(a) TGA thermogram of CL–PLA/CC nanocomposites [45], Reproduced with permission from Kumar V, Composites: Part B; published by Elsevier, 2014.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Mechanical properties: (a) tensile stress, (b) tensile modulus, and (c) unnotched Charpy impact strength of neat PLA and PLA/flax, without and with triacetin [50], Reproduced with permission from Oksman K, Compos. Sci. Technol.; published by Elsevier, 2003.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Mechanical properties: (a) Tensile strength, (b)Young’s modulus, (c) elongation at break, and (d) Charpy impact strength of the composites and neat PLA (MD—machine direction; CD—cross direction; standard deviation are shown as error bars; the letter in the figures a, b, c, d, and e means that there are significant differences between the mean values measured in MD) [67], Reproduced with permission from Graupner N, Composites: Part A; published by Elsevier, 2009.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Mechanical properties: (a) Tensile strength, (b)Young’s modulus, (c) elongation at break, and (d) Charpy impact strength of the composites and neat PLA (MD—machine direction; CD—cross direction; standard deviation are shown as error bars; the letter in the figures a, b, c, d, and e means that there are significant differences between the mean values measured in MD) [67], Reproduced with permission from Graupner N, Composites: Part A; published by Elsevier, 2009.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Dimensionless elongation at break, EB(t)/EB(t0), of the starch-based biodegradable film (Mater-Bi®), additivated with (a) vitamin E (V-E) and quercetin (Q) and (b) synthetic antioxidant (AO) and light stabilizer (LS) [79], Reproduced with permission from Dintcheva NTz, J. Polym. Eng.; published by De Gruyter, 2014.
Figure 15
Figure 15
(a) Carbonyl functionalities, (b) molecular weight variation, and (c) elongation at break of neat PLA (PR0) and PLA containing 1 and 3 wt.% of R (PR1 and PR3) as a function of the irradiation time [82], Reproduced with permission from Agustin-Salazar S, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.; published by ACS Publications, 2014.
Figure 16
Figure 16
Variation of anhydride band area for neat PLA and PLA containing (a) 0.5 and 1 wt.% [93], Reproduced with permission from Dintcheva NTz, Polym. Degrad. Stab.; published by Elsevier, 2017, and (b) 2 and 3 wt.% of ferulic acid (FA) [26], Reproduced with permission from Dintcheva NTz, Polym. Degrad. Stab.; published by Elsevier, 2018.

References

    1. Scott G., Gilead D., editors. Degradable Polymers. Chapman & Hall; London, UK: 1995.
    1. Gross R.A., Kalra B. Biodegradable Polymers for the Environment. Science. 2002;297:803–807. doi: 10.1126/science.297.5582.803. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basrioli C., editor. Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers. Rapra Technol. Lim.; Shropshire, UK: 2005.
    1. Platt D.K., editor. Biodegradable Polymers—Market Report. Rapra Technol. Lim.; Shropshire, UK: 2006.
    1. Ebnesajjad S. Handbook of Biopolymers and Biodegradable Plastics. Elsevier; Oxford, UK: 2013.

LinkOut - more resources