Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 25;10(4):551.
doi: 10.3390/ani10040551.

In Vitro Methods of Assessing Protein Quality for Poultry

Affiliations
Review

In Vitro Methods of Assessing Protein Quality for Poultry

Dervan D S L Bryan et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Protein quality assessment of feed ingredients for poultry is often achieved using in vitro or in vivo testing. In vivo methods can be expensive and time consuming. Protein quality can also be evaluated using less expensive and time consuming chemical methods, termed in vitro. These techniques are used to improve the user's efficiency when dealing with large sample numbers, and some mimic the physiological and chemical characteristics of the animal digestive system to which the ingredient will be fed. The pepsin digestibility test is the in vitro method of choice for quick evaluation of protein sample during quality control and in most research settings. Even though the pepsin digestibility test uses enzymes to liberate the amino acids from the protein, it does not mimic normal in vivo digestive conditions. The results obtained with this method may be misleading if the samples tested contain fats or carbohydrates which they often do. Multi-enzyme tests have been proposed to overcome the problem encountered when using the pepsin digestibility test. These tests use a combination of enzymes in one or multiple steps customized to simulate the digestive process of the animal. Multi enzyme assays can predict animal digestibility, but any inherent biological properties of the ingredients on the animal digestive tract will be lost.

Keywords: dietary protein; digestibility assay; in vitro; pH stat method; pepsin digestibility assay; poultry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plot of correlation between in vivo and in vitro crude protein (CP) digestible of nine high protein poultry feed ingredients [93].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bland Altman Plot of the difference between in vivo and in vitro crude protein (CP) digestible of nine high protein feed ingredients [93]; LoA: limits of agreement

References

    1. Parsons C., Castanon F., Han Y. Protein and amino acid quality of meat and bone meal. Poult. Sci. 1997;76:361–368. doi: 10.1093/ps/76.2.361. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adedokun S.A., Adeola O., Parsons C.M., Lilburn M.S., Applegate T.J. Standardized ileal amino acid digestibility of plant feedstuffs in broiler chickens and turkey poults using a nitrogen-free or casein diet. Poult.Sci. 2008;87:2535–2548. doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00387. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim E.J., Utterback P.L., Applegate T.J., Parsons C.M. Comparison of amino acid digestibility of feedstuffs determined with the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay and the standardized ileal amino acid digestibility assay. Poult. Sci. 2011;90:2511–2519. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01400. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhagavan N.V., Bhagavan N.V. Medical Biochemistry. Jones and Bartlett Publishers; Boston, UK: 1992.
    1. Ravindran V., Bryden W.L. Amino acid availability in poultry—In vitro and in vivo measurements. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1999;50:889–908. doi: 10.1071/AR98174. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources