Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;27(1):e9-e19.
doi: 10.3747/co.27.5499. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

Patient and physician perceptions of lung cancer care in a multidisciplinary clinic model

G Linford  1 , R Egan  2 , A Coderre-Ball  3 , N Dalgarno  3 , C J L Stone  4 , A Robinson  1 , D Robinson  5 , S Wakeham  5 , G C Digby  1   4   6
Affiliations

Patient and physician perceptions of lung cancer care in a multidisciplinary clinic model

G Linford et al. Curr Oncol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer (lc) is a complex disease requiring coordination of multiple health care professionals. A recently implemented lc multidisciplinary clinic (mdc) at Kingston Health Sciences Centre, an academic tertiary care hospital, improved timeliness of oncology assessment and treatment. This study describes patient, caregiver, and physician experiences in the mdc.

Methods: We qualitatively studied patient, caregiver, and physician experiences in a traditional siloed care model and in the mdc model. We used purposive sampling to conduct semi-structured interviews with patients and caregivers who received care in one of the models and with physicians who worked in both models. Thematic design by open coding in the ATLAS.ti software application (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development, Berlin, Germany) was used to analyze the data.

Results: Participation by 6 of 72 identified patients from the traditional model and 6 of 40 identified patients from the mdc model was obtained. Of 9 physicians who provided care in both models, 8 were interviewed (2 respirologists, 2 medical oncologists, 4 radiation oncologists). Four themes emerged: communication and collaboration, efficiency, quality of care, and effect on patient outcomes. Patients in both models had positive impressions of their care. Patients in the mdc frequently reported convenience and a positive effect of family presence at appointments. Physicians reported that the mdc improved communication and collegiality, clinic efficiency, patient outcomes and satisfaction, and consistency of information provided to patients. Physicians identified lack of clinic space as an area for mdc improvement.

Conclusions: This qualitative study found that a lc mdc facilitated patient communication and physician collaboration, improved quality of care, and had a perceived positive effect on patient outcomes.

Keywords: Quality of care; lung cancer; multidisciplinary models; patient experiences; process improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES We have read and understood Current Oncology’s policy on disclosing conflicts of interest, and we declare that we have none.

References

    1. Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2018. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2018.
    1. Jacobsen MM, Silverstein SC, Quinn M, et al. Timeliness of access to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment: a scoping literature review. Lung Cancer. 2017;112:156–64. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.08.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buccheri G, Ferrigno D. Lung cancer: clinical presentation and specialist referral time. Eur Respir J. 2004;24:898–904. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00113603. - DOI - PubMed
    1. asco–esmo consensus statement on quality cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3498–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.4021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Osarogiagbon RU. Overcoming the implementation gap in multidisciplinary oncology care programs. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12:888–91. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.014688. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types