Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Aug;27(8):671-680.
doi: 10.1111/acem.13922. Epub 2020 Mar 27.

Myocardial Infarction Can Be Safely Excluded by High-sensitivity Troponin I Testing 3 Hours After Emergency Department Presentation

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Myocardial Infarction Can Be Safely Excluded by High-sensitivity Troponin I Testing 3 Hours After Emergency Department Presentation

W Frank Peacock et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The accuracy and speed by which acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is excluded are an important determinant of emergency department (ED) length of stay and resource utilization. While high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) >99th percentile (upper reference level [URL]) represents a "rule-in" cutpoint, our purpose was to evaluate the ability of the Beckman Coulter hsTnI assay, using various level-of-quantification (LoQ) cutpoints, to rule out AMI within 3 hours of ED presentation in suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.

Methods: This multicenter evaluation enrolled adults with >5 minutes of ACS symptoms and an electrocardiogram obtained per standard care. Exclusions were ST-segment elevation or chronic hemodialysis. After informed consent was obtained, blood samples were collected in heparin at ED admission (baseline), ≥1 to 3, ≥3 to 6, and ≥6 to 9 hours postadmission. Samples were processed and stored at -20°C within 1 hour and were tested at three independent clinical laboratories on an immunoassay system (DxI 800, Beckman Coulter). Analytic cutpoints were the URL of 17.9 ng/L and two LoQ cutpoints, defined as the 10 and 20% coefficient of variation (5.6 and 2.3 ng/L, respectively). A criterion standard MI diagnosis was adjudicated by an independent endpoint committee, blinded to hsTnI, and using the universal definition of MI.

Results: Of 1,049 patients meeting the entry criteria, and with baseline and 1- to 3-hour hsTnI results, 117 (11.2%) had an adjudicated final diagnosis of AMI. AMI patients were typically older, with more cardiovascular risk factors. Median (IQR) presentation time was 4 (1.6-16.0) hours after symptom onset, although AMI patients presented ~0.5 hour earlier than non-AMI. Enrollment and first blood draw occurred at a mean of ~1 hour after arrival. To evaluate the assay's rule-out performance, patients with any hsTnI > URL were considered high risk and were excluded. The remaining population (n = 829) was divided into four LoQ relative categories: both hsTnI < LoQ (Lo-Lo cohort); first hsTnI < LoQ and 2nd > LoQ (Lo-Hi cohort); first > LoQ and second < LoQ (Hi-Lo cohort); or both > LoQ (Hi-Hi cohort). In patients with any hsTnI result <20% CV LoQ (Groups 1-3), n = 231 (23.9% ruled out), AMI negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 98.9% to 100%). In patients with any hsTnI below the 10% LoQ, n = 611 (58% rule out), AMI NPV was 100% (95% CI = 99.5% to 100%). Of the Hi-Hi cohort (i.e., no hsTnI below the 10% LoQ, but both < URL), there were four AMI patients, NPV was 98.2% (95% CI = 95.4% to 99.3%), and sensitivity was 96.6.

Conclusions: Patients presenting >3 hours after the onset of suspected ACS symptoms, with at least two Beckman Coulter Access hsTnI < URL and at least one of which is below either the 10 or the 20% LoQ, had a 100% NPV for AMI. Two hsTnI values 1 to 3 hours apart with both < URL, but also >LoQ had inadequate sensitivity and NPV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of patients with all hsTnI below the upper reference level (17.9 ng/L), and serial hsTnI as stratified by above (Hi) or below (Lo) the 20% LoQ (2.3 ng/L). URL= upper reference level, defined as the 99th percentile of a normal population. LoQ = level of quantification. PPV = positive predictive value. NPV = negative predictive value. hsTnI = high sensitive troponin I. hsTnImax = the highest hsTnI level in the cohort. 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. Delta = hsTnI difference between 1st and 2nd levels. All hsTnI were below the URL for this analysis. Lo‐Lo = both hsTnI levels below the LoQ. Lo‐Hi = 1st hsTnI < LoQ, 2nd > LoQ. Hi‐Lo = 1st hsTnI > LoQ, 2nd < LoQ. Hi‐Hi = both hsTnI >LoQ.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of patients with all hsTnI below the upper reference level (17.9 ng/L), and serial hsTnI as stratified by above (Hi) or below (Lo) the 10% LoQ (5.6 ng/L). URL= upper reference level, defined as the 99th percentile of a normal population. LoQ = level of quantification. PPV = positive predictive value. NPV = negative predictive value. hsTnI = high sensitive troponin I. hsTnImax = the highest hsTnI level in the cohort. 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. Delta = hsTnI difference between 1st and 2nd levels. All hsTnI were below the URL for this analysis. Lo‐Lo = both hsTnI levels below the LoQ. Lo‐Hi = 1st hsTnI < LoQ, 2nd > LoQ. Hi‐Lo = 1st hsTnI > LoQ, 2nd < LoQ. Hi‐Hi = both hsTnI >LoQ.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time from symptom onset to first blood draw

Comment in

References

    1. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey . Emergency Department Summary Tables. 2016. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/NHAMC.... Accessed Aug 5, 2019.
    1. Than M, Herbert M, Flaws D, et al. What is an acceptable risk of major adverse cardiac event in chest pain patients soon after discharge from the emergency department?: a clinical survey. Int J Cardiol 2013;166:752–4. - PubMed
    1. Lyon AW, Kavsak PA, Lyon OA, Worster A, Lyon ME. Simulation models of misclassification error for single thresholds of high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin I due to assay bias and imprecision. Clin Chem 2017;63:585–92. - PubMed
    1. Jaffe AS, Apple FS, Morrow DA, Lindahl B, Katus HA. Being rational about (im)precision: a statement from the Biochemistry Subcommittee of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/World Heart Federation Task Force for the definition of myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 2010;56:941–3. - PubMed
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012;126:2020–35. - PubMed

Publication types