Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;29(6):1142-1150.
doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1266. Epub 2020 Mar 29.

Perspectives from individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia on direct contact in cascade screening

Affiliations

Perspectives from individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia on direct contact in cascade screening

Rachel Schwiter et al. J Genet Couns. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common inherited form of high cholesterol that significantly increases the risk for coronary artery disease. Early detection and treatment can decrease morbidity and mortality and provide important risk information to family members. However, FH remains vastly underdiagnosed and undertreated. Cascade screening is the process of iteratively testing first-degree relatives for a genetic disease. It has been shown to effectively identify individuals with undiagnosed FH. The majority of research on methods for cascade screening has been conducted outside of the United States (U.S.). For indirect contact, index cases encourage relatives to undergo testing, and for direct contact, healthcare providers (HCP) obtain the index case's consent to contact relatives and offer information. Currently, there is not an accepted strategy for cascade screening programs in the U.S. This study investigated perspectives on direct and indirect contact for cascade screening from individuals with FH. An online survey was designed in collaboration with the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation (FHF). Fifty-eight percent of U.S. index cases (11/19, 57.9%) and all international index cases (8/8, 100%) indicated willingness to provide contact information for certain at-risk relatives to a HCP for the purpose of directly informing relatives of their risk for FH in a hypothetical scenario. These findings provide an example of U.S. data and additional international data suggesting that some individuals with FH may consider direct contact a reasonable approach to improve screening uptake among family members. These initial findings need further confirmation in a larger group.

Keywords: cascade screening; cascade testing; communication; direct cascade screening; direct contact; familial hypercholesterolemia; genetic counseling.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abul-Husn, N. S., Manickam, K., Jones, L. K., Wright, E. A., Hartzel, D. N., Gonzaga-Jauregui, C., … Barr, M. L. (2016). Genetic identification of familial hypercholesterolemia within a single U.S. health care system. Science, 354(6319), aaf7000.
    1. Ademi, A., Watts, G. F., Pang, J., Sijbrands, E. J. G., van Bockzmer, F. M., O’Leary, P., … Liew, D. (2014). Cascade screening based on genetic testing is cost-effective: Evidence for the implementation of models of care for familial hypercholesterolemia. Journal of Clinical Lipidology, 8, 390-400.
    1. Ahmad, Z. S., Andersen, R. L., Andersen, L. H., O'Brien, E. C., Kindt, I., Shrader, P., … Knowles, J. W. (2016). US physician practices for diagnosing familial hypercholesterolemia: Data from the CASCADE-FH registry. Journal of Clinical Lipidology, 10(5), 1223-1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2016.07.011
    1. Benn, M., Watts, G. F., Tybjaerg-Hansen, A., & Nordestgaard, B. G. (2016). Mutations causative of familial hypercholesterolaemia: Screening of 98 098 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study estimated a prevalence of 1 in 217. European Heart Journal, 37(17), 1384-1394.
    1. Campbell, M., Humanki, J., & Zierhut, H. (2017). A novel approach to screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in a large public venue. Journal of Community Genetics, 8(1), 35-44.

LinkOut - more resources