Buprenorphine dispensing in an epicenter of the U.S. opioid epidemic: A case study of the rural risk environment in Appalachian Kentucky
- PMID: 32223985
- PMCID: PMC7529684
- DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102701
Buprenorphine dispensing in an epicenter of the U.S. opioid epidemic: A case study of the rural risk environment in Appalachian Kentucky
Abstract
Background: Buprenorphine is a cornerstone to curbing opioid epidemics, but emerging data suggest that rural pharmacists in the US sometimes refuse to dispense this medication. We conducted a case study to explore buprenorphine dispensing practices in 12 rural Appalachian Kentucky counties, and analyze whether and how they were shaped by features of the rural risk environment.
Methods: In this case study, we conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with 14 pharmacists operating 15 pharmacies in these counties to explore buprenorphine dispensing practices and perceived influences on these practices. Thematic analyses of the resulting transcripts revealed three features of the rural risk environment that shaped dispensing. To explore these three risk environment features, we analyzed policy documents (e.g., Attorney General lawsuits) and administrative databases (e.g., incarceration data). Textual documents were analyzed using thematic analyses and administrative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; memoes explored relationships among risk environment features and dispensing practices.
Results: Twelve of the 15 pharmacies limited dispensing, by refusing to serve new patients; limiting dispensing to known patients or prescribers; or refusing to dispense buprenorphine altogether. Concerns about exceeding a "Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) cap" on opioid dispensing stifled dispensing. A legacy of aggressive and fraudulent marketing of opioid analgesics (OAs) by pharmaceutical companies and physician OA overprescribing undermined pharmacist trust in buprenorphine and in its prescribers. The escalating local war on drugs may have undermined dispensing by reinforcing stigma against people who use drugs.
Conclusions: Initiatives to increase buprenorphine prescribing must be accompanied by policy changes to increase dispensing. Specifically, buprenorphine should be removed from opioid monitoring systems; efforts to de-escalate the war on drugs should be extended to encompass rural areas; initiatives to dismantle aggressive OA marketing should be strengthened; and efforts to re-build pharmacist trust in physicians are needed.
Keywords: Buprenorphine; implementation chasm; pharmacists; risk environment; rural areas.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Alexander M (2020).The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorbindness. New York: The New Press.
-
- Allen B, & Harocopos A (2016). Non-prescribed buprenorphine in New York City: motivations for use, practices of diversion, and experiences of stigma. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 70, 81–86. - PubMed
-
- American Academy of Family Physicians. (2016). Stakeholders’ Challenges and Red Flag Warning Signs Related to Prescribing and Dispensing Controlled Substances. Retrieved from https://nabp.pharmacy/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Red-Flags-Controlled-Su....
-
- Amiri S, Lutz R, Socías E, McDonell MG, Roll JM, & Amram O (2018). Increased distance was associated with lower daily attendance to an opioid treatment program in Spokane County Washington. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 93, 26–30. - PubMed
-
- Andrilla CHA, Moore TE, Patterson DG, & Larson EH (2019). Geographic Distribution of Providers With a DEA Waiver to Prescribe Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A 5-Year Update. The Journal of Rural Health, 35(1), 108–112. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
