Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):182-188.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003851.

Oncological Resection for Liver Malignancies: Can the Laparoscopic Approach Provide Benefits?

Affiliations

Oncological Resection for Liver Malignancies: Can the Laparoscopic Approach Provide Benefits?

Tomoaki Yoh et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery has become an increasingly popular alternative approach to open surgery, resulting in a paradigm shift in liver surgery. Although laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) was initially indicated for small benign and peripheral tumors, at present more than half of LLRs are performed in malignant tumors. Several studies have reported the feasibility of LLR in malignant disease and suggested various short-term benefits compared to open liver resection, including decreased blood loss and postoperative complications and a shorter hospital stay. Although these benefits are important to surgeons, patients, and providers, the main goal of surgery for malignancies is to achieve a maximum oncologic benefit. The relevance of the laparoscopic approach must be assessed in relation to the possibility of respecting basic oncological rules and the expertise of the center. Easy LLRs can be safely performed by most surgeons with minimum expertise in liver surgery and laparoscopy, and can therefore probably provide an oncological benefit. On the other hand, intermediate or difficult LLRs require technical expertise and an oncological benefit can only be achieved in expert centers. Technical standardization is the only way to obtain an oncological benefit with this type of resection, and many problems must still be solved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that they do not have anything to disclose regarding funding or conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.

References

    1. Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 2016; 263:761–777.
    1. Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, et al. The Southampton Consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg 2018; 268:11–18.
    1. Jin B, Chen MT, Fei YT, et al. Safety and efficacy for laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:A26–A34.
    1. Syn NL, Kabir T, Koh YX, et al. Survival advantage of laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials and propensity-score matched studies. Ann Surg 2019; doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003672. [Epub ahead of print]. - DOI
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Organisation For Research, Treatment of Cancer. EASLEORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012; 56:908–943.