Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the Management of Critically Ill Adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
- PMID: 32224769
- PMCID: PMC7176264
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004363
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the Management of Critically Ill Adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Abstract
Background: The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a rapidly spreading illness, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), affecting thousands of people around the world. Urgent guidance for clinicians caring for the sickest of these patients is needed.
Methods: We formed a panel of 36 experts from 12 countries. All panel members completed the World Health Organization conflict of interest disclosure form. The panel proposed 53 questions that are relevant to the management of COVID-19 in the ICU. We searched the literature for direct and indirect evidence on the management of COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the ICU. We identified relevant and recent systematic reviews on most questions relating to supportive care. We assessed the certainty in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, then generated recommendations based on the balance between benefit and harm, resource and cost implications, equity, and feasibility. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of best practice recommendations.
Results: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued 54 statements, of which four are best practice statements, nine are strong recommendations, and 35 are weak recommendations. No recommendation was provided for six questions. The topics were: 1) infection control, 2) laboratory diagnosis and specimens, 3) hemodynamic support, 4) ventilatory support, and 5) COVID-19 therapy.
Conclusion: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued several recommendations to help support healthcare workers caring for critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. When available, we will provide new evidence in further releases of these guidelines.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Yaseen Arabi is the principal investigator on a clinical trial for lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon in Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and he was a nonpaid consultant on antiviral active for MERS-coronavirus (CoV) for Gilead Sciences and SAB Biotherapeutics. He is an investigator on REMAP-CAP trial and is a Board Members of the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC). Dr. Eddy Fan declared receiving consultancy fees from ALung Technologies and MC3 Cardiopulmonary. Dr. Maurizio Cecconi declared consultancy work with Edwards Lifesciences, Directed Systems, and Cheetah Medical. Dr. Lennie Derde is the NVIC (Dutch National ICU society) chair of Taskforce Infectious Diseases (standing committee), member of ESICM Coronavirus Taskforce (started with this outbreak), chair ESICM Clinical Training Committee, all are unpaid positions. Dr. Frederick Hyden is non-compensated consultant to Gilead Sciences (antivirals for RVIS including remdesivir), Regeneraon (monoclonals for RVIs including MERS), and SAB Biotherapeutics (polyclonal antibodies for RVIs including MERS). The remaining authors have disclosed that they have no potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients.Crit Care. 2020 Apr 23;24(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02892-9. Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32326959 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Situation update worldwide, 4 March 2020. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/geographical-distribution-2019-ncov-cases.
-
- Alhazzani W, Lewis K, Jaeschke R, Rochwerg B, Moller MH, Evans L, Wilson KC, Patel S, Coopersmith CM, Cecconi M, Guyatt G, Akl EA. Conflicts of interest disclosure forms and management in critical care clinical practice guidelines. Intensive Care Med (2018) 44: 1691–1698 - PubMed
-
- Vandvik PO, Alhazzani W, Moller MH. Understanding conflicts of interest. Intensive Care Med (2018) 44: 1738–1740 - PubMed
-
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, Alderson P, Glasziou P, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 64: 395–400 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous