Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Apr;104(4):779-787.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002970.

Differential Influence of Donor Age Depending on the Indication for Liver Transplantation-A Collaborative Transplant Study Report

Affiliations
Observational Study

Differential Influence of Donor Age Depending on the Indication for Liver Transplantation-A Collaborative Transplant Study Report

Philipp Houben et al. Transplantation. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Despite steadily increasing donor age, there are no general guidelines for the use of organs from elderly donors in liver transplantation. This study focuses on identifying the recipients who are less affected from an old-donor organ graft and conversely in whom a rather unfavorable outcome is expected because of high donor age.

Methods: Forty-eight thousand two hundred sixty-one adult liver transplantations, performed between 2000 and 2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study, were analyzed.

Results: The proportion of ≥65-year-old donors has risen to >33% in recent years. The donor age has an approximately linear influence on graft survival. On average, each year's rise in the donor age was associated with a 0.9% increase in the risk of graft loss (hazard ratio [HR], 1.009; P < 0.001). The impact of donor age was strong in patients with hepatitis C-related cirrhosis (HR, 1.013; P < 0.001), substantial in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (HR, 1.007; P < 0.001) and rather weak in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 1.003; P = 0.038). The increase in the risk of graft loss per year rise in donor age was 1.4% for 18 to 49 year olds, 1.0% for middle-aged, and only 0.4% for ≥60-year-old recipients (all P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Consequently, older recipients and especially patients with hepatocellular carcinoma seem to be less affected by an increased donor age, whereas the donor age is an important factor in all other patient groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V, et al.; All contributing centers (www.eltr.org); European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA)Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR).J Hepatol201257675–688
    1. Feng S, Goodrich NP, Bragg-Gresham JL, et al. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.Am J Transplant20066783–790
    1. Lozanovski VJ, Khajeh E, Fonouni H, et al. The impact of major extended donor criteria on graft failure and patient mortality after liver transplantation.Langenbecks Arch Surg2018403719–731
    1. Halldorson JB, Bakthavatsalam R, Fix O, et al. D-MELD, a simple predictor of post liver transplant mortality for optimization of donor/recipient matching.Am J Transplant20099318–326
    1. Blok JJ, Braat AE, Adam R, et al.; European Liver Intestine Transplant Association Eurotransplant Liver Intestine Advisory Committee; Eurotransplant Liver Intestine Advisory CommitteeValidation of the donor risk index in orthotopic liver transplantation within the eurotransplant region.Liver Transpl201218112–119

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources