The practical other: teleology and its development
- PMID: 32226198
- PMCID: PMC7099935
- DOI: 10.1080/03080188.2018.1453246
The practical other: teleology and its development
Abstract
We argue for teleology as a description of the way in which we ordinarily understand others' intentional actions. Teleology starts from the close resemblance between the reasoning involved in understanding others' actions and one's own practical reasoning involved in deciding what to do. We carve out teleology's distinctive features more sharply by comparing it to its three main competitors: theory theory, simulation theory, and rationality theory. The plausibility of teleology as our way of understanding others is underlined by developmental data in its favour.
Keywords: Theory of mind; counterfactual reasoning; perspective taking; rationality theory; reasons for action; simulation theory; teleology; theory theory.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Figures



References
-
- Anscombe GE. Intention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1957.
-
- Apperly IA, Butterfill SA. Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States? Psychological Review. 2009;116:953–970. - PubMed
-
- Barlassina Luca, Gordon Robert M. Folk Psychology as Mental Simulation. In: Zalta Edward N., editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition) 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/folkpsych-simulation.
-
- Brand M. Intending and Acting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1984.
-
- Bratman ME. Intention, Practical Rationality, and Self-Governance. Ethics. 2009;119(3):411–443.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources