Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018;43(2):99-114.
doi: 10.1080/03080188.2018.1453246. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

The practical other: teleology and its development

Affiliations

The practical other: teleology and its development

Josef Perner et al. Interdiscip Sci Rev. 2018.

Abstract

We argue for teleology as a description of the way in which we ordinarily understand others' intentional actions. Teleology starts from the close resemblance between the reasoning involved in understanding others' actions and one's own practical reasoning involved in deciding what to do. We carve out teleology's distinctive features more sharply by comparing it to its three main competitors: theory theory, simulation theory, and rationality theory. The plausibility of teleology as our way of understanding others is underlined by developmental data in its favour.

Keywords: Theory of mind; counterfactual reasoning; perspective taking; rationality theory; reasons for action; simulation theory; teleology; theory theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Children’s number of competitive poaching moves in relation to their passing the false belief test. Data from Priewasser, Roessler, and Perner (2013).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of children with a majority of pragmatically adequate choices overcoming the mutual exclusivity bias. Data from Gollek and Doherty (2016, Experiments 2 and 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Per cent children who give the correct answer to counterfactual and corresponding false belief questions. Data from Leahy, Rafetseder, and Perner (2017).

References

    1. Anscombe GE. Intention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1957.
    1. Apperly IA, Butterfill SA. Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States? Psychological Review. 2009;116:953–970. - PubMed
    1. Barlassina Luca, Gordon Robert M. Folk Psychology as Mental Simulation. In: Zalta Edward N., editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition) 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/folkpsych-simulation.
    1. Brand M. Intending and Acting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1984.
    1. Bratman ME. Intention, Practical Rationality, and Self-Governance. Ethics. 2009;119(3):411–443.

LinkOut - more resources