Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 23;12(2):e7084.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.7084.

The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?

Amir Goodarzi  1 , Jared Clouse  1 , Tatiana Capizzano  1 , Kee D Kim  2 , Ripul Panchal  3
Affiliations

The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?

Amir Goodarzi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Objective Traditionally, laminectomy has been the preferred surgical approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors. Recent trends towards minimally invasive techniques have generated interest in hemilaminectomy as an effective alternative surgical approach to resect spinal tumors. However, it remains unclear if the potential benefits of hemilaminectomies, used in other routine spinal procedures, apply to intradural spinal tumors. This report presents a six-year single institutional analysis of open resection of intradural tumors using laminectomies as compared to hemilaminectomies. Methods A single institution, multisurgeon, retrospective review of 52 patients undergoing resection of intradural spinal tumors over a six-year period was performed. Estimated blood loss, operative time, post-operative complications, length of stay, and post-operative clinical spinal instability were analyzed and compared between the two surgical techniques. Results The mean follow-up was 34 and 20 months for the laminectomy and hemilaminectomy groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in operative times between the two groups (hemilaminectomy: 250.13±76.44 minutes, laminectomy: 244.49±92.85 minutes; p=0.43). Similarly, there was no difference in overall estimated blood loss (hemilaminectomy: 125±74 cc, laminectomy: 256.05±320.8 cc; p=0.27) or mean hospital length of stay (hemilaminectomy: 4.00±2.12 days, laminectomy: 5.26±3.0 days; p=0.60). No patient in either surgical group had post-operative evidence of clinical spinal instability. Conclusion Hemilaminectomy is a viable approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors, with similar rates of post-operative complications to laminectomy when using an open surgical approach. The laminectomy allows for bilateral exposure of the entire spinal canal and neural foramina; and continues to be the preferred method for resection of large tumors with complex morphology.

Keywords: extramedullary; hemilaminectomy; intradural; intramedullary; laminectomy; spinal tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Different surgical approaches for spinal schwannoma: a single surgeon's experience with 49 consecutive cases. Lee SE, Jahng TA, Kim HJ. World Neurosurg. 2015;84:1894–1902. - PubMed
    1. Unilateral partial hemi-laminectomy for the removal of extra- and intramedullary tumours and AVMs. Yasargil MG, Tranmer BI, Adamson TE, Roth P. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 1991;18:113–132. - PubMed
    1. Some notable American spine surgeons of the 19th century. Keller T, Holland MC. Spine. 1997;22:1413–1417. - PubMed
    1. Sir Victor Horsley (1857-1916): pioneer of neurological surgery. Tan TC, Black PM. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:607–611. - PubMed
    1. Microsurgical unilateral approaches for spinal tumour surgery: eight years' experience in 256 primary operated patients. Chiou SM, Eggert HR, Laborde G, Seeger W. Acta Neurochir. 1989;100:127–133. - PubMed