Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;101(1-2):21-37.
doi: 10.1111/iep.12346. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

Experimental models and methods for cutaneous wound healing assessment

Affiliations
Review

Experimental models and methods for cutaneous wound healing assessment

Daniela S Masson-Meyers et al. Int J Exp Pathol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Wound healing studies are intricate, mainly because of the multifaceted nature of the wound environment and the complexity of the healing process, which integrates a variety of cells and repair phases, including inflammation, proliferation, reepithelialization and remodelling. There are a variety of possible preclinical models, such as in mice, rabbits and pigs, which can be used to mimic acute or impaired for example, diabetic and nutrition-related wounds. These can be induced by many different techniques, with excision or incision being the most common. After determining a suitable model for a study, investigators need to select appropriate and reproducible methods that will allow the monitoring of the wound progression over time. The assessment can be performed by non-invasive protocols such as wound tracing, photographic documentation (including image analysis), biophysical techniques and/or by invasive protocols that will require wound biopsies. In this article, we provide an overview of some of the most often needed and used: (a) preclinical/animal models including incisional, excisional, burn and impaired wounds; (b) methods to evaluate the healing progression such as wound healing rate, wound analysis by image, biophysical assessment, histopathological, immunological and biochemical assays. The aim is to help researchers during the design and execution of their wound healing studies.

Keywords: cutaneous wound models; experimental animal models; in vivo models; skin ulcer; tissue repair; wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Common models used in wound healing studies
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative images of different experimental wound healing models (excisional wounds on the dorsal surface in rats and rabbits ear), showing the use of different punch diameters and also a representation of follow‐up immediately after surgery (Day 0), during the inflammatory phase (Day 2) and reepithelialization (Day 14)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Common methods used to investigate wound healing

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mulkalwar S, Behera L, Golande P, Manjare R, Patil H. Evaluation of wound healing activity of topical phenytoin in an excision wound model in rats. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2015;4:139‐143.
    1. Shrimanker M, Patel N, Modi H, Dave R. A review: screening models for wound healing activity in animals. Am J Pharm Tech Res. 2013;3:237‐251.
    1. Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res. 2009;37:1528‐1542. - PubMed
    1. Koschwanez HE, Broadbent E. The use of wound healing assessment methods in psychological studies: a review and recommendations. Br J Health Psychol. 2011;16:1‐32. - PubMed
    1. Mendonça A, Ferreira A, Barbieri C, Thomazine J, Mazzer N. Efeitos do ultra‐som pulsado de baixa intensidade sobre a cicatrização por segunda intenção de lesões cutâneas totais em ratos. Acta Ortop Bras. 2006;14:152‐157.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources