Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May:126:108961.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108961. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT?

Affiliations

Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT?

Chunqin Long et al. Eur J Radiol. 2020 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) and real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) for COVID-19 pneumonia.

Methods: This retrospective study included all patients with COVID-19 pneumonia suspicion, who were examined by both CT and rRT-PCR at initial presentation. The sensitivities of both tests were then compared. For patients with a final confirmed diagnosis, clinical and laboratory data, in addition to CT imaging findings were evaluated.

Results: A total of 36 patients were finally diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia. Thirty-five patients had abnormal CT findings at presentation, whereas one patient had a normal CT. Using rRT-PCR, 30 patients were tested positive, with 6 cases initially missed. Amongst these 6 patients, 3 became positive in the second rRT-PCR assay(after 2 days, 2 days and 3 days respectively), and the other 3 became positive only in the third round of rRT-PCR tests(after 5 days, 6 days and 8 days respectively). At presentation, CT sensitivity was therefore 97.2%, whereas the sensitivity of initial rRT-PCR was only 83.3%.

Conclusion: rRT-PCR may produce initial false negative results. We suggest that patients with typical CT findings but negative rRT-PCR results should be isolated, and rRT-PCR should be repeated to avoid misdiagnosis.

Keywords: Coronavirus; Pneumonia; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome; Tomography; X-Ray Computed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart for patient inclusion.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A 45-year-old male patient with COVID-19 pneumonia showed patchy consolidations and ground glass opacities in both lungs. These were mainly distributed peripherally, with a random distribution pattern.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A 41-year-old female patient presented with a fever for 3 days. CT examination showed ground glass opacities in the upper lobe of right lung (A). rRT-PCR results on the same day were negative. Re-examinations with CT 2 days later showed that CT abnormalities had expanded and increased (B). Second round rRT-PCR remained negative. Upon another repeat rRT-PCR the next day, the patient was confirmed as virus positive.

References

    1. Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chung M., Bernheim A., Mei X. CT Imaging Features of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Radiology. 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pan Y., Guan H. Imaging changes in patients with 2019-nCov. Eur Radiol. 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corman V.M., Landt O., Kaiser M. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(3) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubin E.J., Baden L.R., Morrissey S., Campion E.W. Medical Journals and the 2019-nCoV Outbreak. N Engl J Med. 2020 - PubMed