Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 29;10(3):e034595.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034595.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis with individual participant data on cord management at preterm birth (iCOMP): study protocol

Collaborators, Affiliations

Systematic review and network meta-analysis with individual participant data on cord management at preterm birth (iCOMP): study protocol

Anna Lene Seidler et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Timing of cord clamping and other cord management strategies may improve outcomes at preterm birth. However, it is unclear whether benefits apply to all preterm subgroups. Previous and current trials compare various policies, including time-based or physiology-based deferred cord clamping, and cord milking. Individual participant data (IPD) enable exploration of different strategies within subgroups. Network meta-analysis (NMA) enables comparison and ranking of all available interventions using a combination of direct and indirect comparisons.

Objectives: (1) To evaluate the effectiveness of cord management strategies for preterm infants on neonatal mortality and morbidity overall and for different participant characteristics using IPD meta-analysis. (2) To evaluate and rank the effect of different cord management strategies for preterm births on mortality and other key outcomes using NMA.

Methods and analysis: Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, clinical trial registries, and other sources for all ongoing and completed randomised controlled trials comparing cord management strategies at preterm birth (before 37 weeks' gestation) have been completed up to 13 February 2019, but will be updated regularly to include additional trials. IPD will be sought for all trials; aggregate summary data will be included where IPD are unavailable. First, deferred clamping and cord milking will be compared with immediate clamping in pairwise IPD meta-analyses. The primary outcome will be death prior to hospital discharge. Effect differences will be explored for prespecified participant subgroups. Second, all identified cord management strategies will be compared and ranked in an IPD NMA for the primary outcome and the key secondary outcomes. Treatment effect differences by participant characteristics will be identified. Inconsistency and heterogeneity will be explored.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval for this project has been granted by the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2018/886). Results will be relevant to clinicians, guideline developers and policy-makers, and will be disseminated via publications, presentations and media releases.

Registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) (ACTRN12619001305112) and International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42019136640).

Keywords: individual participant data meta-analysis; network meta-analysis; placental transfusion; preterm birth; prospective meta-analysis; umbilical cord clamping; umbilical cord milking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: LD, ACK, CDPM, ED, HR, JK, JM, JJ, KF, OA, SH, VS, VD, WE-N and WT-M are Chief Investigators for potentially eligible trials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Network of possible comparisons between cord management interventions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of network of currently available trials comparing different timings of cord clamping.

References

    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. . National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 2012;379:2162–72. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the Children . WHO : Howson CP, Kinney MV, Lawn JE, Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2012.
    1. Chang HH, Larson J, Blencowe H, et al. . Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. Lancet 2013;381:223–34. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61856-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petrou S, Mehta Z, Hockley C, et al. . The impact of preterm birth on hospital inpatient admissions and costs during the first 5 years of life. Pediatrics 2003;112:1290–7. 10.1542/peds.112.6.1290 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mangham LJ, Petrou S, Doyle LW, et al. . The cost of preterm birth throughout childhood in England and Wales. Pediatrics 2009;123:e312–27. 10.1542/peds.2008-1827 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources