Understanding Different Types of Recreational Runners and How They Use Running-Related Technology
- PMID: 32230999
- PMCID: PMC7177805
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072276
Understanding Different Types of Recreational Runners and How They Use Running-Related Technology
Abstract
This study aims to help professionals in the field of running and running-related technology (i.e., sports watches and smartphone applications) to address the needs of runners. It investigates the various runner types-in terms of their attitudes, interests, and opinions (AIOs) with regard to running-and studies how they differ in the technology they use. Data used in this study were drawn from the standardized online Eindhoven Running Survey 2016 (ERS2016). In total, 3723 participants completed the questionnaire. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis were used to identify the different running types, and crosstabs obtained insights into the use of technology between different typologies. Based on the AIOs, four distinct runner types were identified: casual individual, social competitive, individual competitive, and devoted runners. Subsequently, we related the types to their use of sports watches and apps. Our results show a difference in the kinds of technology used by different runner types. Differentiation between types of runners can be useful for health professionals, policymakers involved in public health, engineers, and trainers or coaches to adapt their services to specific segments, in order to make use of the full potential of running-related systems to support runners to stay active and injury-free and contribute to a healthy lifestyle.
Keywords: attitudes; clusters; interest; mobile applications; recreational running; running-related technology; sports watches; typology; wearable.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Candari C.J., Cylus J., Nolte E. Assessing the Economic Costs of Unhealthy Diets and Low Physical Activity: An Evidence Review and Proposed Framework. [(accessed on 19 December 2019)];Eur. Obs. Health. Syst. Policies. 2017 Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/342166/Unhealthy-Die.... - PubMed
-
- GBD Risk Factors Collaborators Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1659–1724. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Warburton D.E., Charlesworth S., Ivey A., Nettlefold L., Bredin S.S. A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Canada’s Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults. [(accessed on 19 December 2019)];Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010 7:39. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-39. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20459783. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Scheerder J., Breedveld K., Borgers J. Running across Europe: The Rise and Size of One of the Largest Sport Markets. Palgrave Macmillan; Basingstoke, UK: 2015.
-
- Running USA . 2014 State of the Sport—Part II: Running Industry Report. Running USA; Los Angeles, CA, USA: 2014.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
