Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 13:11:415.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00415. eCollection 2020.

High Cognitive Flexibility Learners Perform Better in Probabilistic Rule Learning

Affiliations

High Cognitive Flexibility Learners Perform Better in Probabilistic Rule Learning

Xia Feng et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility reflects the ability to switch quickly between tasks or stimulus sets, which is an important feature of human intelligence. Researchers have confirmed that this ability is related to the learners' academic achievement, cognitive ability, and creativity development. The number-letter switching task is an effective tool for measuring cognitive flexibility. Previous studies have found that high flexibility individuals perform better in rule-based tasks such as the Iowa Gambling Task. It is not clear whether highly flexible learners have learning advantages when the rule tasks involve probabilistic cues. Using an inter-individual differences approach, we examined whether cognitive flexibility, as assessed by the number-letter task, is associated with the learning process of a probabilistic rule task. The results showed that the high flexibility group reached a higher level of rule acquisition, and the accuracy during the post-learning stage was significantly higher than the low flexibility group. These findings demonstrate that cognitive flexibility is associated with the performance after the rule acquisition during the probabilistic rule task. Future research should explore the internal process of learning differences between high and low flexibility learners by using other technologies across multiple modes.

Keywords: cognitive flexibility; probability; reward; rule learning; switch cost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The visual angles of stimulation.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Schematic illustration of an exemplar trial in the coin-searching task.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The learning curve of a typical rule non-learner (A) and a learner (B).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The number of rule discovers for high and low cognitive flexibility groups.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
The average learning curves of the four groups.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
The accuracy of high and low CF groups during different learning stages (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
The accuracy of high and low CF groups during post-learning stage. (A) Accuracy in different probability pairs. (B) Accuracy in different probability differences (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
The latency of high and low cognitive flexibility groups for pre- and post-learning stages in different probability pairs (p < 0.05).

References

    1. Bellebaum C., Daum I. (2008). Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27 1823–1835. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06138.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buchsbaum B. R., Greer S., Chang W.-L., Berman K. F. (2005). Meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of the wisconsin card−sorting task and component processes. Huma Brain Mapp. 25 35–45. 10.1002/hbm.20128 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craig S., Lewandowsky S., Little D. R. (2011). Error discounting in probabilistic category learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 37 673–687. 10.1037/a0022473 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Custers R., Aarts H. (2010). The unconscious will: how the pursuit of goals operates outside of conscious awareness. Science 329 47–50. 10.1126/science.1188595 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dajani D. R., Uddin L. Q. (2015). Demystifying cognitive flexibility: implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience. Trends Neurosci. 38 571–578. 10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources