Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Oct;133(10):1203-1208.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.02.024. Epub 2020 Mar 29.

A Comparison of Biomarker Rise in Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction

Amit K Pandey  1 , Thao Duong  2 , Iwona Swiatkiewicz  3 , Lori B Daniels  4
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Comparison of Biomarker Rise in Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction

Amit K Pandey et al. Am J Med. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Despite differing underlying pathophysiology, type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction share many of the same diagnostic criteria and can be challenging to differentiate in clinical practice. Correctly differentiating type 1 from type 2 myocardial infarction is important because they are managed differently. The aim of this study was to compare the patterns of rise of cardiac troponin (cTn) and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) in type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction.

Methods: We analyzed retrospective data on 200 patients with myocardial infarction (97 with type 1, 103 with type 2), excluding patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The percentage rise from trough to peak values and the ratio of the peak to the upper limit of normal (RULN) were calculated for both cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and CK-MB. The ratio of peak cTnT to peak CK-MB was also calculated before and after adjusting for sex, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and infarct size.

Results: Type 1 myocardial infarction tended to be larger than type 2 myocardial infarction, with a significantly higher mean percentage rise for both cTnT and CK-MB as well as higher mean RULN (207 vs 86 for cTnT, P = 0.02; 9 vs 4 for CK-MB, P = 0.002). There was a trend toward a higher rise of cTnT than CK-MB in type 2 compared with type 1 myocardial infarction, as demonstrated by the ratio of peak cTnT to peak CK-MB (0.09 in type 2 myocardial infarction vs 0.06 in type 1 myocardial infarction, P = 0.06). This difference persisted after adjusting for sex, GFR, and infarct size (P = 0.05).

Conclusion: Both cTnT and CK-MB rise higher in type 1 than in type 2 myocardial infarction. Meanwhile, cTnT tends to rise out of proportion to CK-MB in type 2 myocardial infarction. These patterns may have considerable implications for the differentiation and subsequent treatment of patients with type 1 versus type 2 myocardial infarction.

Keywords: Cardiac troponin; Creatine kinase MB; Type 1 myocardial infarction; Type 2 myocardial infarction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types