Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 29;12(4):822.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12040822.

Therapy-Induced Senescence: An "Old" Friend Becomes the Enemy

Affiliations
Review

Therapy-Induced Senescence: An "Old" Friend Becomes the Enemy

Tareq Saleh et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

For the past two decades, cellular senescence has been recognized as a central component of the tumor cell response to chemotherapy and radiation. Traditionally, this form of senescence, termed Therapy-Induced Senescence (TIS), was linked to extensive nuclear damage precipitated by classical genotoxic chemotherapy. However, a number of other forms of therapy have also been shown to induce senescence in tumor cells independently of direct genomic damage. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive summary of both conventional and targeted anticancer therapeutics that have been shown to induce senescence in vitro and in vivo. Still, the utility of promoting senescence as a therapeutic endpoint remains under debate. Since senescence represents a durable form of growth arrest, it might be argued that senescence is a desirable outcome of cancer therapy. However, accumulating evidence suggesting that cells have the capacity to escape from TIS would support an alternative conclusion, that senescence provides an avenue whereby tumor cells can evade the potentially lethal action of anticancer drugs, allowing the cells to enter a temporary state of dormancy that eventually facilitates disease recurrence, often in a more aggressive state. Furthermore, TIS is now strongly connected to tumor cell remodeling, potentially to tumor dormancy, acquiring more ominous malignant phenotypes and accounts for several untoward adverse effects of cancer therapy. Here, we argue that senescence represents a barrier to effective anticancer treatment, and discuss the emerging efforts to identify and exploit agents with senolytic properties as a strategy for elimination of the persistent residual surviving tumor cell population, with the goal of mitigating the tumor-promoting influence of the senescent cells and to thereby reduce the likelihood of cancer relapse.

Keywords: Cancer; Cancer Therapy; Dormancy; Recurrence; Reversibility; Senescence; Senolytic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Hayflick L., Moorhead P.S. The Serial Cultivation of Human Diploid Cell Strains. Exp. Cell Res. 1961;25:585–621. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90192-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hayflick L. The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp. Cell Res. 1965;636:614–636. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90211-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shay J.W., Woodring E. Wright Hayflick, his limit, and cellular ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000;1:72–76. doi: 10.1038/35036093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharpless N.E., Sherr C.J. Forging a signature of in vivo senescence. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:397–408. doi: 10.1038/nrc3960. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hernandez-Segura A., Nehme J., Demaria M. Hallmarks of Cellular Senescence. Trends Cell Biol. 2018;28:436–453. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources