Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;64(2):111-120.
doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000216. Epub 2020 Mar 27.

Diabetes-Specific Questionnaires Validated in Brazilian Portuguese: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Diabetes-Specific Questionnaires Validated in Brazilian Portuguese: A Systematic Review

Leonardo Grabinski Bottino et al. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Two researchers conducted independent searches on five different electronic databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, SciELO, LiLACS and Web of Science. Studies were selected that covered cross-cultural adaptation methodology and validation in Brazil with type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients of any age. After reading the full-text articles, data related to psychometric characteristics were extracted from each study selected. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's α (Cα). The initial searches identified 2,211 studies. After exclusions, 26 were included, covering a total of 31 questionnaires. Questionnaires were grouped into 11 domains based on their main focus of interest: adherence (n = 8), quality of life (n = 7), diabetes knowledge (n = 3), hypoglycemia (n = 3), self-efficacy (n = 3), satisfaction with pharmaceutical services (n = 1), emotional stress (n = 2), hope (n = 1), attitude towards diabetes (n = 1), perception of disease severity (n=1), and risk of developing diabetes (n = 1). This study identified and reviewed all of the diabetes-specific questionnaires that have been validated for Brazilian Portuguese, which should facilitate selection of the most appropriate instrument for each domain of interest in future research and clinical settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram: identification and selection of studies included in the systematic review.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Within Group Bias Risk Assessment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Global report on diabetes: World Health Organization; 2016.
    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th ed. 2017. p. 1-150.
    1. Telo GH, Cureau FV, de Souza MS, Andrade TS, Copês F, Schaan BD. Prevalence of diabetes in Brazil over time: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016;8(1):65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ministério da Saúde Brasil. Estratégias para o cuidado da pessoa com doença crônica: Diabetes Mellitus. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2013.
    1. Bhutani J, Bhutani S. Worldwide burden of diabetes. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2014;18(6):868. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources