Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;35(1):55-66.
doi: 10.1111/scs.12843. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

Healthcare teams and patient-related terminology: a review of concepts and uses

Cecilia Flores-Sandoval  1 , Shannon Sibbald  2 , Bridget L Ryan  3 , Joseph B Orange  1   4   5
Affiliations
Review

Healthcare teams and patient-related terminology: a review of concepts and uses

Cecilia Flores-Sandoval et al. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Discussions concerning health care teams and patient-related terminology remain an ongoing debate. Terms such as interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary, as well as interprofessional are ambiguously defined and frequently used, rightly or wrongly, interchangeably. Also, clarification on the terminology regarding patients is rarely explicitly addressed in the health care team's literature, potentially resulting in confusion among health professional students, novice researchers, and practitioners.

Methods: A structured literature review was conducted. Electronic searches were performed from August 2018 to September 2019 on the following databases: CINHAL, Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, Nursing and Allied Health and JSTOR. The following terms were used: 'terminology', 'team(s)', 'nursing', 'health', 'medical', 'education', 'interprofessional', 'interdisciplinary', 'multidisciplinary', 'transdisciplinary', 'collaboration', 'patient', 'client', 'customer', 'user' and 'person'.

Results: Small but significant nuances in the use of language and its implications for patient care can be made visible for health professional education and clinical practice. Healthcare is necessarily interdisciplinary and therefore we are obligated, and privileged, to think more critically about the use of terminology to ensure we are supporting high-quality evidence and knowledge application.

Conclusion: To avoid confusion and lack of consistency in the peer-review literature, authors should be encouraged to offer brief definitions and the rationale for the use of a particular term or group of term. In addition, a deeper understanding of the values that each patient-related term represents for particular disciplines or health care professions is essential to achieve a more comprehensive conceptual rigour.

Keywords: healthcare professions; healthcare teams; patient care; review; terminology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mitzkat A, Berger S, Reeves S, Mahler C. More terminological clarity in the interprofessional field - a call for reflection on the use of terminologies, in both practice and research, on a national and international level. GMS J Med Educ 2016; 33: 1-6.
    1. Choi BCK, Pak AWP. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. Clin Investig Med 2007; 30: E224-32.
    1. Choi BCK, Pak AWP. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clin Investig Med 2006; 29: 351-64.
    1. Failla KR, Macauley K. Interprofessional simulation: a concept analysis. Clin Simul Nurs 2014; 10: 574-80.
    1. Kvarnström S, Hedberg B, Cedersund E. The dual faces of service user participation: Implications for empowerment processes in interprofessional practice. J Soc Work 2013; 13: 287-307.

LinkOut - more resources