Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;58(9):1004-1014.
doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0456-0. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

Responsiveness of the Motor Capacities Scale to upper limb reconstructive surgery in persons with tetraplegia due to cervical spinal cord injury

Charles Fattal  1 , Michel Enjalbert  2 , Jacques Teissier  3 , Bertrand Coulet  4 , Emerson Fachin-Martins  5
Affiliations

Responsiveness of the Motor Capacities Scale to upper limb reconstructive surgery in persons with tetraplegia due to cervical spinal cord injury

Charles Fattal et al. Spinal Cord. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Study design: Psychometric Study.

Objectives: To assess responsiveness of the Motor Capacities Scale (MCS) in people with tetraplegia who have undergone upper limb reconstructive surgery.

Settings: Rehabilitation clinics in France.

Methods: The MCS is an arm/hand function test with 31 basic tasks, subdivided into four sub-categories (MCS A, MCS B, MCS C, and MCS D). Data were recorded preoperatively and following full completion of the surgical program. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and a ten-point numeric scale related to patients' satisfaction with the overall surgical result were included. Data were analyzed using responsiveness measures-the effect size (ES), the standardized response mean (SRM), and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

Results: Twenty-seven participants were included. Fourteen patients underwent unilateral surgery and 13 bilateral surgery. ES and SRM were moderate or good (ES/SRM of MCS B = 0.76/0.81, ES/SRM MCS C = 0.68/0.77, and ES/SRM MCS D = 0.77/0.88). For MCS A and FIM, both SRM and ES showed a small degree of responsiveness. For the MCS total score, the ES value indicated a moderate degree of responsiveness while SRM was excellent. Total MCS score, MCS C subscore and MCS D subscore showed significantly higher ES values in the "bilateral surgery" group than in the "unilateral group". The estimation of MCIDs showed low threshold values of MCS scores changes (total score and subscores) beyond which the satisfaction rate is >6.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence of acceptable responsiveness of the MCS to changes using the SRM following upper limb reconstruction in patients with tetraplegia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Sinnott KA, Dunn JA, Rothwell AG. Use of the ICF conceptual framework to interpret hand function outcomes following tendon transfer surgery for tetraplegia. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:396–400. - DOI
    1. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2002.
    1. Carpenter C, Forwell SJ, Jongbloed LE, Backman CL. Community participation after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:427–33. - DOI
    1. Sinnott KA, Dunn JA, Wangdell J, Johanson ME, Hall AS, Post MW. Measurement of outcomes of upper limb reconstructive surgery for tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:S169–81. - DOI
    1. Mulcahey MJ, Hutchinson D, Kozin S. Assessment of upper limb in tetraplegia: considerations in evaluation and outcomes research. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:91–102. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources