Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;70(1):199-208.
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1739054. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Predictors of uptake and retention in an intervention to improve social reactions to disclosures of sexual assault and partner abuse

Affiliations

Predictors of uptake and retention in an intervention to improve social reactions to disclosures of sexual assault and partner abuse

Emily A Waterman et al. J Am Coll Health. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Objective Examine uptake (e.g., initial session participation) and retention (e.g., booster session participation) in an intervention about responding to sexual assault and partner abuse disclosures. Participants: Participants were 836 students (primarily White; upper-middle class) at a medium-sized university. Method: Participants completed baseline surveys, were invited to a two-session intervention, and responded to a follow-up survey. Results: Initial session attendance was 36.2% (n = 303); of those, 83.1% (n = 252) attended the booster. Female, sexual minority students, and students with fewer prior negative reactions, and higher initial session satisfaction were more likely to attend than other students. Participants' reported reasons for not attending included scheduling problems and topic discomfort. Participants reported that remote attendance and higher cash incentives would have made attendance more likely. Conclusion: Findings indicate the draw of cash incentives, a need to reach high-risk students and integrate into existing organizations, and the potential for individualized prevention.

Keywords: Intervention; intimate partner violence; recruitment; retention; sexual assault.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Participant retention and attrition across data collection time points (N = 1,268)
Note. aTwo participants attended but left early; these participants are not included in analyses. bWe conducted a series of chi-square and t-test analyses to compare intervention group participants who completed the Time 2 survey to those who did not complete the Time 2 survey on Time 1 constructs. Participants who completed the Time 2 survey were more likely to be women, less likely to be a PA victim during their lifetime, gave less negative social reactions, and were more likely to have attended both the initial and booster session. Groups did not differ at baseline on year of college, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, receiving a SA/PA disclosure in the past six months, lifetime SA victimization, or whether they had provided positive social reactions or intended to provide positive and negative social reactions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Salazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, Hardin J, Berkowitz A. A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014;16(9). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Senn CY, Forrest A. “And then one night when I went to class…”: The impact of sexual assault bystander intervention workshop incorporated in academic classes Psychology of Violence 2016. 6(4):607–618.
    1. Supplee LH, Parekh J, Johnson M. Principles of precision prevention science for Iimproving recruitment and retention of participants. Prevention Science. 2018;19:689–694. - PubMed
    1. Sims BE, Crump AD. Commentary on participation in preventive interventions. Prevention Science. 2018;19(685–688). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolin KY, Bennett FF, McNeill LH, Sorensen G, Emmons KM. Low discretionary time as a barrier to physical activity and intervention uptake American Journal of Health Behavior. 2009;32(6 ):563–569. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types