Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020:146:167-188.
doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

Project PLACE: Enhancing community and academic partnerships to describe and address health disparities

Affiliations
Review

Project PLACE: Enhancing community and academic partnerships to describe and address health disparities

Nadine J Barrett et al. Adv Cancer Res. 2020.

Abstract

Achieving cancer health equity is a national imperative. Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States and in North Carolina (NC), where the disease disproportionately impacts traditionally underrepresented race and ethnic groups, those who live in rural communities, the impoverished, and medically disenfranchised and/or health-disparate populations at high-risk for cancer. These populations have worse cancer outcomes and are less likely to be participants in clinical research and trials. It is critical for cancer centers and other academic health centers to understand the factors that contribute to poor cancer outcomes, the extent to which they impact the cancer burden, and develop effective interventions to address them. Key to this process is engaging diverse stakeholders in the development and execution of community and population health assessments, and the subsequent programs and interventions designed to address the need across the catchment area. This chapter describes the processes and lessons learned of the Duke Cancer Institute's (DCI) long standing community partnerships that led to Project PLACE (Population Level Approaches to Cancer Elimination), a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded community health assessment reaching 2315 respondents in 7 months, resulting in a community partnered research agenda to advance cancer equity within the DCI catchment area. We illustrate the application of a community partnered health assessment and offer examples of strategic opportunities, successes, lessons learned, and implications for practice.

Keywords: Capacity; Community engagement; Community health assessment; Health disparities; Health equity; Partnerships.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Partnership development, survey dissemination, data collection, and reporting process.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Project PLACE: survey collection outcomes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amstrong AJ (2017). Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology, 15(3). - PubMed
    1. Baquet CR, Commiskey P, Daniel Mullins C, & Mishra SI (2006). Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: Socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 30(1), 24–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bandini M, Preisser F, Nazzani S, et al. (2018). The effect of other-cause mortality adjustment on access to alternative treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer among African American patients. European Urology Oncology, 1(3), 215–222. 10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrett NJ, Hawkins TV, Wilder J, Ingraham KL, Worthy V, Boyce X, et al. (2016). Implementation of a health disparities & equity program at the Duke Cancer Institute. Oncology Issues, 31(5), 48–57.
    1. Barrett NJ, Ingraham KL, Vann Hawkins T, & Moorman PG (2017). Engaging African Americans in research: The recruiter’s perspective. Ethnicity & Disease, 27(4), 453–462. - PMC - PubMed

Further reading

    1. Barrett NJ, Rodriguez EM, Iachan R, et al. (2020). Factors associated with biomedical research participation within community-based samples across 3 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. Cancer, 126(5), 1077–1089. 10.1002/cncr.32487. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dang JHT, & Chen MS Jr. (2018). Time, trust, and transparency: Lessons learned from collecting blood biospecimens for cancer research from the Asian American community. Cancer, 124(Suppl. 7), 1614–1621. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fouad MN, Johnson RE, Nagy MC, Person SD, & Partridge EE (2014). Adherence and retention in clinical trials: A community-based approach. Cancer, 120(Suppl. 7), 1106–1112. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haring RC, Henry WA, Hudson M, Rodriguez EM, & Taualii M (2018). Views on clinical trial recruitment, biospecimen collection, and cancer research: Population science from landscapes of the Haudenosaunee (People of the Longhouse). Journal of Cancer Education, 33(1), 44–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Langford A, Resnicow K, & An L (2010). Clinical trial awareness among racial/ethnic minorities in HINTS 2007: Sociodemographic, attitudinal, and knowledge correlates. Journal of Health Communication, 15(Suppl. 3), 92–101. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms