Effects of dual-task demands on the complexity and task performance of submaximal isometric handgrip force control
- PMID: 32242254
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04357-x
Effects of dual-task demands on the complexity and task performance of submaximal isometric handgrip force control
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the effect of cognitive-motor dual-task load on temporal structure irregularity (complexity) of motor output and task performance of submaximal isometric contractions.
Methods: Twelve young, sedentary subjects performed handgrip isometric contractions until failure at 50% of maximal voluntary contraction under mathematical self-regulated dual-task (own pace; SDT), regulated dual-task (imposed pace; RDT), and control. Force signal complexity was calculated by sample entropy at the initial, middle, and final thirds. Task performance was assessed by muscle fatigue (time to failure and rate of median frequency of the radial flexor of the carpus), force and math task error, and self-perceived difficulty.
Results: Only RDT decreased complexity with respect to control (17.4% ± 12.6%, p = 0.005), all conditions decreased complexity by the final third (Control: 52.8% ± 18.7%, p < 0.001; SDT: 41.1% ± 32.1%, p = 0.003; RDT: 19.1% ± 21.9%, p = 0.035). Conditions did not affect time to failure, and only RDT decreased the rate of median frequency (0.1%/s ± 0.1%/s, p = 0.020). Inferior force error rate was increased by conditions (SDT: 1.5% ± 0.8%, p < 0.001; RDT: 2% ± 1.5%, p = 0.002). Math error was only augmented by RDT (from 9.9 ± 6.7 to 51.7 ± 18.8, p < 0.001), categorized as "very hard" in 85.7% of participants (p = 0.015).
Conclusion: Only the RDT condition reduced complexity and neuromuscular fatigue while increasing force error rate of the handgrip's motor output, without affecting time to failure. A highly demanding dual-task may become a strategy to modify the organization of the hand force motor output, which may contribute to its motor adaptations.
Keywords: Cognitive demand; Entropy; Motor control; Muscle activity; Strength.
References
-
- Athreya DN, Van Orden G, Riley MA (2012) Feedback about isometric force production yields more random variations. Neurosci Lett 513:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Brown TL, Carr TH (1989) Automaticity in skill acquisition: mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:686–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.4.686 - DOI
-
- Chatain C, Radel R, Vercruyssen F et al (2019) Influence of cognitive load on the dynamics of neurophysiological adjustments during fatiguing exercise. Psychophysiology 56:e13343. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13343 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cruz-Montecinos C, Calatayud J, Iturriaga C et al (2018) Influence of a self-regulated cognitive dual task on time to failure and complexity of submaximal isometric force control. Eur J Appl Physiol 118:2021–2027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3936-6 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Evstigneeva M, Aleksandrov A, Mathiassen SE, Lyskov E (2012) Concurrent cognitive task may improve motor work performance and reduce muscle fatigue. Work 41:2893–2896. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0540-2893 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
