Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Dec;19(12):3357-3366.
doi: 10.1111/jocd.13390. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

The efficacy of bleomycin for treating keloid and hypertrophic scar: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The efficacy of bleomycin for treating keloid and hypertrophic scar: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Woo Il Kim et al. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Pathologic scars can lead to itching, erythema, and psychological stress due to cosmetic problems. Bleomycin, one of anticancer agents, has been used for treating keloid or hypertrophic scar. Some studies have shown that bleomycin can induce markedly scar improvement.

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of bleomycin compared to corticosteroid as well as other treatments for keloid or hypertrophic scar using meta-analysis methods.

Methods: A computerized search was performed in different databases including Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two controlled clinical trials (CCTs) were included. Then, statistical analyses of extracted outcome data from the studies were calculated using Rex (version 3.0.1; RexSoft Inc).

Results: Scar improvement was significantly increased in the bleomycin group compared to the triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) group (SMD: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.30-0.88, P < .0001). In addition, there was also statistically significant difference between the bleomycin group and the 5-FU group (SMD: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.88-1.85, P < .0001). Bleomycin increased relatively scar improvement compared to TAC combined with 5-FU, although there was no statistical difference (SMD: 0.63, 95% CI: -0.59-1.84, P = .3108). Furthermore, bleomycin demonstrated significantly increased improvement of scar compared to TAC combined with cryotherapy (SMD: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.48-1.74, P = .0006).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis found that bleomycin was more effective for treating keloid or hypertrophic scar than other treatments including TAC, 5-FU, TAC combined with 5-FU, and TAC combined with cryotherapy. However, further comprehensive studies, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to perform objective analysis.

Keywords: bleomycin; hypertrophic scar; keloid.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Nurden AT, Nurden P, Sanchez M, Andia I, Anitua E. Platelets and wound healing. Front Biosci. 2008;13:3532-3548.
    1. Gonzalez ACdO, Costa TF, Andrade ZDA, Medrado ARAP. Wound healing - A literature review. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91:614-620.
    1. Gauglitz GG, Korting HC, Pavicic T, Ruzicka T, Jeschke MG. Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol Med. 2011;17:113-125.
    1. Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, et al. International clinical recommendations on scar management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:560-571.
    1. Rabello FB, Souza CD, Farina Junior JA. Update on hypertrophic scar treatment. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014;69:565-573.

LinkOut - more resources