Poly-4-Hydroxybutyric Acid Mesh Compares Favorably With Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction
- PMID: 32243319
- DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002339
Poly-4-Hydroxybutyric Acid Mesh Compares Favorably With Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction
Abstract
Background: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is commonly used during immediate expander-based breast reconstruction, with potential advantages of greater intraoperative expansion, decreased time to complete expansion, and decreased rates of capsular contracture. However, ADM is associated with increased infection rate, seroma, and subsequent reconstructive failure. Poly-4-hydroxybutyric acid (P4HB) mesh is a large pore, biosynthetic scaffold shown to fully resorb and incorporate host tissues within 18 months. We sought to compare outcomes between the use of P4HB and ADM in immediate retropectoral expander-based reconstruction.
Methods: One hundred ninety-two consecutive cases (107 patients) of breast reconstruction using ADM were compared with a subsequent cohort of 112 cases (62 patients) using P4HB mesh. In all patients, reconstruction was performed immediately after mastectomy by a single surgeon, and outcomes were compared between groups.
Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the P4HB and ADM groups. Overall infection rates were lower, but not significantly with P4HB (11% vs 17%, P = 0.18). Time to drain removal was significantly lower with P4HB (15 vs 18 days, P = 0.008), although there was no difference in rates of seroma (0.9% vs 3%, P = 0.43). Similar numbers of patients underwent external beam radiation (22% vs 24%) and received chemotherapy in each group (48% vs 45%). By univariate analysis, all odds ratios were decreased with use of P4HB, including risk of major complications (0.55), seroma (0.17), infection (0.59), need for reoperation (0.78), and skin necrosis (0.77).
Conclusions: Initial findings suggest P4HB mesh to be a safe alternative to ADM in expander-based breast reconstruction, with trends toward decreased rates of infection, seroma, and need for device removal using P4HB mesh. Although our results are limited to a small series of initial patients, P4HB mesh may be a promising novel technique to decrease complications inherent to use of ADM at a reduced material cost.
Similar articles
-
Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate for Pocket Control without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 4-Year Review.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jul 1;154(1):15-24. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010914. Epub 2023 Jul 6. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024. PMID: 37410610
-
Does the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix Increase Postoperative Complications of the First-Stage Reconstruction of Immediate Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Study.Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Oct;79(4):341-345. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001067. Ann Plast Surg. 2017. PMID: 28509694
-
Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Feb;89:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.12.008. Epub 2023 Dec 12. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024. PMID: 38160591
-
Dermal Autografts in Breast Reconstruction: A Review of Past and Current Trends.Ann Plast Surg. 2020 May;84(5):618-622. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002128. Ann Plast Surg. 2020. PMID: 31904644 Review.
-
Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Mar;48(5):925-935. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03500-1. Epub 2023 Jul 18. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 37464216
Cited by
-
Polydioxanone Internal Support Matrix: A Rationale for Prophylactic Internal Bra Support in Breast Augmentation.Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 Mar 30;4:ojac021. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac021. eCollection 2022. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022. PMID: 35592182 Free PMC article.
-
pH regulatory divergent point for the selective bio-oxidation of primary diols during resting cell catalysis.Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022 Jun 30;15(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13068-022-02171-5. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022. PMID: 35773746 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Synthetic Mesh Outcomes in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction.Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Aug 21;6:ojae066. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae066. eCollection 2024. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024. PMID: 39346802 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fully resorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh for soft tissue repair and reconstruction: A scoping review.Front Surg. 2023 Apr 12;10:1157661. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1157661. eCollection 2023. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 37123542 Free PMC article.
-
High expression of transmembrane P24 trafficking protein 9 predicts poor prognosis in breast carcinoma.Bioengineered. 2021 Dec;12(1):8965-8979. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1990673. Bioengineered. 2021. PMID: 34635011 Free PMC article.
References
-
- How common is breast cancer? Breast Cancer Statistics. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/about/how-common-is-breast-c.... Accessed July 11, 2019.
-
- Ng SK, Hare RM, Kuang RJ, et al. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy: patient satisfaction and decision making. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76:640–644.
-
- Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:15–23.
-
- Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:232–239.
-
- Pittman TA, Fan KL, Knapp A, et al. Comparison of different acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstruction: the 50/50 study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:521–528.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous