Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Apr;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-S6.
doi: 10.1111/idj.12570.

Introducing the Oral-B iO electric toothbrush: next generation oscillating-rotating technology

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Introducing the Oral-B iO electric toothbrush: next generation oscillating-rotating technology

Ralf Adam. Int Dent J. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: A novel oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush (Oral-B iO) has been developed with a linear magnetic drive, resulting in oscillation-rotations with micro-vibrations. The mechanism directs motor energy directly to the bristle tips. The brush also has a redesigned round brush head and smart pressure sensor to enhance plaque removal and encourage proper brushing technique.

Methods: The plaque removal and gingival health effects of this new electric toothbrush technology were evaluated in three randomized controlled studies summarized in this supplement, including an 8-week trial versus a manual toothbrush, an 8-week trial versus a premium sonic toothbrush, and a single-brushing, repetitive-use study versus a manual toothbrush.

Results: Outcomes from these studies demonstrate statistically significantly greater plaque removal and gingival health improvements for the Oral-B iO toothbrush technology versus manual and sonic toothbrush controls. Plaque removal advantages demonstrated in the replicate-use single-brushing trial resulted in significant gingival health benefits as evidenced in the longer-term trials. In addition, gingivitis case status assessments based on the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) and European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) guidelines show that over 80% of subjects using the Oral-B iO transitioned from 'gingivitis' (≥10% bleeding sites) at baseline to 'generally healthy' (<10% bleeding sites) at week 8 in both longer-term clinical trials, versus 24% in the manual toothbrush group and 53% in the sonic toothbrush group.

Conclusions: This uniquely designed oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush with a linear magnetic drive delivers significantly greater plaque removal and gingival health benefits with additional features to improve brushing experience and clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Dental plaque; gingivitis; micro-vibrations; oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 2
Figure 2
The Oral-B Ultimate Clean brush head with ‘tuft in tuft’ technology
Figure 3
Figure 3
Smart pressure sensor provides positive feedback (green light) when optimal pressure (0.8–2.5 N) is used
Figure 1
Figure 1
The Oral-B iO oscillating-rotating electric rechargeable toothbrush
Figure 4
Figure 4
The Oral-B iO group had a higher percentage of subjects categorized as having a ‘healthy’ gingivitis status (<10% bleeding sites) at week 8 compared to a manual toothbrush and sonic toothbrush: results from two clinical studies,
Figure 5
Figure 5
Number of bleeding sites percent change from baseline at week 8 for Oral-B iO and a mid-range O-R brush versus the same comparator sonic brush: results from two randomized clinical trials conducted at the same clinical site, using the same clinical design with the same investigator,
Figure 6
Figure 6
Reduction in the number of bleeding sites at week 8 versus baseline number of bleeding sites for Oral-B iO and the comparator sonic brush

References

    1. Robinson PG, Deacon SA, Deery C, et al. Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;18:CD002281. - PubMed
    1. Yaacob M, Worthington H, Deacon SA et al. Powered versus manual toothbrush for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 CD002281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van der Weijden FA, Slot DE. Efficacy of homecare regimens for mechanical plaque removal in managing gingivitis: a meta review. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(Suppl 16):S77–S91. - PubMed
    1. Pitchika V, Pink C, Völzke H, et al. Long-term impact of powered toothbrush on oral health: 11-year cohort study. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46:713–722. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elkerbout TA, Slot DE, Rosema NAM, et al. How effective is a powered toothbrush as compared to a manual toothbrush? A systematic review and meta-analysis of single brushing exercises. Int J Dent Hyg. 2020;18:17–26. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types