Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID-19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies
- PMID: 32243678
- DOI: 10.1002/alr.22577
Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID-19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies
Abstract
Background: International experience with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) suggests it poses a significant risk of infectious transmission to skull base surgeons, due to high nasal viral titers and the unknown potential for aerosol generation during endonasal instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to simulate aerosolization events over a range of endoscopic procedures to obtain an evidence-based aerosol risk assessment.
Methods: Aerosolization was simulated in a cadaver using fluorescein solution (0.2 mg per 10 mL) and quantified using a blue-light filter and digital image processing. Outpatient sneezing during endoscopy was simulated using an intranasal atomizer in the presence or absence of intact and modified surgical mask barriers. Surgical aerosolization was simulated during nonpowered instrumentation, suction microdebrider, and high-speed drilling after nasal fluorescein application.
Results: Among the outpatient conditions, a simulated sneeze event generated maximal aerosol distribution at 30 cm, extending to 66 cm. Both an intact surgical mask and a modified VENT mask (which enables endoscopy) eliminated all detectable aerosol spread. Among the surgical conditions, cold instrumentation and microdebrider use did not generate detectable aerosols. Conversely, use of a high-speed drill produced significant aerosol contamination in all conditions tested.
Conclusion: We confirm that aerosolization presents a risk to the endonasal skull base surgeon. In the outpatient setting, use of a barrier significantly reduces aerosol spread. Cold surgical instrumentation and microdebrider use pose significantly less aerosolization risk than a high-speed drill. Procedures requiring drill use should carry a special designation as an "aerosol-generating surgery" to convey this unique risk, and this supports the need for protective personal protective equipment.
Keywords: COVID-19; aerosol-generating surgery; aerosolization; endoscopy; nasal endoscopy.
© 2020 ARS-AAOA, LLC.
Comment in
-
Aerosol or droplet: critical definitions in the COVID-19 era.Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Aug;10(8):968-969. doi: 10.1002/alr.22591. Epub 2020 Jun 15. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020. PMID: 32323923 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Europe's doctors repeat errors made in Wuhan, China medics say. Bloom News. 2020.
-
- Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1177-1179.
-
- van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. (in press). 2020;
-
- Brüske-Hohlfeld I, Preissler G, Jauch KW, et al. Surgical smoke and ultrafine particles. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008;3:31.
-
- Kelley JB, Paschal BM. Fluorescence-based quantification of nucleocytoplasmic transport. Methods. 2019;157:106-114.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical