Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May/Jun;135(3):343-353.
doi: 10.1177/0033354920912215. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

A Public Health Systems View of Risk Communication About Zika

Affiliations

A Public Health Systems View of Risk Communication About Zika

Tara Kirk Sell et al. Public Health Rep. 2020 May/Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: The spread of Zika virus throughout Latin America and parts of the United States in 2016 and 2017 presented a challenge to public health communicators. The objective of our study was to describe emergency risk communication practices during the 2016-2017 Zika outbreak to inform future infectious disease communication efforts.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 13 public health policy makers and practitioners, 10 public information officers, and 5 vector-control officials from May through August 2017.

Results: Within the public health macro-environment, extended outbreak timeframe, government trust, US residence status, and economic insecurity set the backdrop for Zika communication efforts. Limited resources, staffing, and partnerships negatively affected public health structural capacity for communication efforts. Public health communicators and practitioners used a range of processes and practices to engage in education and outreach, including fieldwork, community meetings, and contact with health care providers. Overall, public health agencies' primary goals were to prevent Zika infection, reduce transmission, and prevent adverse birth outcomes.

Conclusions: Lessons learned from this disease response included understanding the macro-environment, developing partnerships across agencies and the community, and valuing diverse message platforms. These lessons can be used to improve communication approaches for health officials at the local, state, and federal levels during future infectious disease outbreaks.

Keywords: communicable diseases; emerging infectious diseases; health communications; outbreaks; preparedness; public health practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Components of the public health communication system. Data source: Modified from Handler et al.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Crisis and emergency risk communication (CERC) manual. https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/manual/index.asp. Published 2014. Accessed October 25, 2018.
    1. Tinker TL. Crisis Communications: Best Practices for Government Agencies and Non-profit Organizations. McLean, VA: Booz, Allen, Hamilton; 2010.
    1. Glik DC. Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;28(1):33-54.10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schoch-Spana M., Brunson E., Chandler H. et al.. Recommendations on how to manage anticipated communication dilemmas involving medical countermeasures in an emergency. Public Health Rep. 2018;133(4):366-378.10.1177/0033354918773069 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Communicating Risk in Public Health Emergencies: A WHO Guideline for Emergency Risk Communication (ERC) Policy and Practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. http://www.who.int/risk-communication/guidance/download/en. Accessed October 25, 2018. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms