Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 20;12(3):732.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12030732.

Comparison of Current Surgical and Non-Surgical Treatment Strategies for Early and Locally Advanced Stage Glottic Laryngeal Cancer and Their Outcome

Affiliations
Review

Comparison of Current Surgical and Non-Surgical Treatment Strategies for Early and Locally Advanced Stage Glottic Laryngeal Cancer and Their Outcome

Olgun Elicin et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

For the treatment of early and locally advanced glottic laryngeal cancer, multiple strategies are available. These are pursued and supported by different levels of evidence, but also by national and institutional traditions. The purpose of this review article is to compare and discuss the current evidence supporting different loco-regional treatment approaches in early and locally advanced glottic laryngeal cancer. The focus is kept on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and comparative retrospective studies including the treatment period within the last twenty years (≥ 1999) with at least one reported five-year oncologic and/or functional outcome measure. Based on the equipoise in oncologic and functional outcome after transoral laser surgery and radiotherapy, informed and shared decision-making with and not just about the patient poses a paramount importance for T1-2N0M0 glottic laryngeal cancer. For T3-4aN0-3M0 glottic laryngeal cancer, there is an equipoise regarding the partial/total laryngectomy and non-surgical modalities for T3 glottic laryngeal cancer. Patients with extensive and/or poorly functioning T4a laryngeal cancer should not be offered organ-preserving chemoradiotherapy with salvage surgery as a back-up plan, but total laryngectomy and adjuvant (chemo) radiation. The lack of high-level evidence comparing contemporary open or transoral robotic organ-preserving surgical and non-surgical modalities does not allow any concrete conclusions in terms of oncological and functional outcome. Unnecessary tri-modality treatments should be avoided. Instead of offering one-size-fits-all approaches and over-standardized rigid institutional strategies, patient-centered informed and shared decision-making should be favored.

Keywords: chemotherapy; head and neck cancer; laryngeal cancer; organ-preservation; radiotherapy; squamous cell carcinoma; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Megwalu U.C., Sikora A.G. Survival outcomes in advanced laryngeal cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2014;140:855–860. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1671. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute SEER: Cancer Stat Facts: Larynx Cancer. [(accessed on 13 September 2019)];2016 Available online: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/laryn.html.
    1. Kernan J.D. Malignancies of the larynx; shall we employ surgery or radiotherapy? Med. Rec. 1946;159:351. - PubMed
    1. Osborn H.A., Hu A., Venkatesan V., Nichols A., Franklin J.H., Yoo J.H., Ceron M., Whelan F., Fung K. Comparison of endoscopic laser resection versus radiation therapy for the treatment of early glottic carcinoma. J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2011;40:200–204. - PubMed