Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 20;17(6):2075.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062075.

Budgeting for Environmental Health Services in Healthcare Facilities: A Ten-Step Model for Planning and Costing

Affiliations

Budgeting for Environmental Health Services in Healthcare Facilities: A Ten-Step Model for Planning and Costing

Darcy M Anderson et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Environmental health services (EHS) in healthcare facilities (HCFs) are critical for safe care provision, yet their availability in low- and middle-income countries is low. A poor understanding of costs hinders progress towards adequate provision. Methods are inconsistent and poorly documented in costing literature, suggesting opportunities to improve evidence. The goal of this research was to develop a model to guide budgeting for EHS in HCFs. Based on 47 studies selected through a systematic review, we identified discrete budgeting steps, developed codes to define each step, and ordered steps into a model. We identified good practices based on a review of additional selected guidelines for costing EHS and HCFs. Our model comprises ten steps in three phases: planning, data collection, and synthesis. Costing-stakeholders define the costing purpose, relevant EHS, and cost scope; assess the EHS delivery context; develop a costing plan; and identify data sources (planning). Stakeholders then execute their costing plan and evaluate the data quality (data collection). Finally, stakeholders calculate costs and disseminate findings (synthesis). We present three hypothetical costing examples and discuss good practices, including using costing frameworks, selecting appropriate indicators to measure the quantity and quality of EHS, and iterating planning and data collection to select appropriate costing approaches and identify data gaps.

Keywords: WaSH; budgeting; cleaning; costing; environmental health; healthcare facilities; infection prevention and control; waste management; water, sanitation, and hygiene.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A process model for costing environmental health services (EHS) in healthcare facilities.

References

    1. Bouzid M., Cumming O., Hunter P.R. What is the impact of water sanitation and hygiene in healthcare facilities on care seeking behaviour and patient satisfaction? A systematic review of the evidence from low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob. Health. 2018;3:e000648. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000648. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pittet D., Allegranzi B., Storr J., Donaldson L. Clean Care is Safer Care: The Global Patient Safety Challenge 2005–2006. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2006;10:419–424. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2006.06.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ducel G., Fabry J., Nicolle L. Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Infections. 2nd ed. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2002.
    1. Allegranzi B., Nejad B.S., Combescure C., Graafmans W., Attar H., Donaldson L., Pittet D. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377:228–241. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nejad S.B., Allegranzi B., Syed S.B., Ellis B., Pittet D. Health-care-associated infection in Africa: A systematic review. Bull. World Health Organ. 2011;89:757–765. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.088179. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types