Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):263.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-04987-8.

Solidarity, vulnerability and mistrust: how context, information and government affect the lives of women in times of Zika

Affiliations

Solidarity, vulnerability and mistrust: how context, information and government affect the lives of women in times of Zika

Ana Rosa Linde-Arias et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The public health response to Zika outbreak has mostly focused on epidemiological surveillance, vector control, and individual level preventative measures. This qualitative study employs a social-ecological framework to examine how macro (historical, legislative, political, socio-economic factors), meso (sources of information, social support, social mobilization) and micro level factors (individual actions, behavioral changes) interacted to influence the response and behavior of women with respect to Zika in different contexts.

Methods: A qualitative study was carried out. Women were recruited through the snowball sampling technique from various locations in Brazil, Puerto Rico, and the United States. They were of different nationalities and ethnicities. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The data transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Women in this study deemed the information provided as insufficient, which led them to actively reach out and access a variety of media sources. Social networks played a vital role in sharing information but also resulted in the spread of hoaxes or rumors. Participants in our research perceived socio-economic inequities but focused on how to remedy their microenvironments. They did not engage in major social activities. Lack of trust in governments placed women in vulnerable situations by preventing them to follow the guidance of health authorities. These impacts were also a result of the response tactics of health and government administrations in their failed attempts to ensure the well-being of their countries' populations.

Conclusions: Our findings call for public health interventions that go beyond individual level behavioral change campaigns, to more comprehensively address the broader meso and macro level factors that influence women' willingness and possibility to protect themselves.

Keywords: Information; Maternal and child health; Public health; Social determinants; Women; Zika.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Socio-ecological approach to the ZIKA epidemic

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gulland A. Zika virus is a global public health emergency, declares WHO. BMJ. 2016;352:i657. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i657. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carabali M, Austin N, King NB, Kaufman JS. The Zika epidemic and abortion in Latin America: a scoping review. Glob Health Res Policy. 2018;3(15). 10.1186/s41256-018-0069-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Zika Epidemiology Update, July 2019. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/zika/zika-epidemiology-update-j....
    1. Puerto Rico Department of Health. Virus del Zika -material educativo para la comunidad. 2017. Retrieved from http://www.salud.gov.pr/Sobre-tu-Salud/Pages/Educacion.aspx. Accessed 20 July 2019.
    1. Thangamani S, Huang J, Hart C, Guzman H, Tesh R. Transmission of Zika virus in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med. 2016;95(5):1169–1173. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0448. - DOI - PMC - PubMed