Prophylactic Clipping After Colorectal Endoscopic Resection Prevents Bleeding of Large, Proximal Polyps: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
- PMID: 32247023
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.051
Prophylactic Clipping After Colorectal Endoscopic Resection Prevents Bleeding of Large, Proximal Polyps: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
Abstract
Background & aims: The benefits of prophylactic clipping to prevent bleeding after polypectomy are unclear. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials to assess the efficacy of clipping in preventing bleeding after polypectomy, overall and according to polyp size and location.
Methods: We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for randomized trials that compared the effects of clipping vs not clipping to prevent bleeding after polypectomy. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to generate pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Multilevel random-effects metaregression analysis was used to combine data on bleeding after polypectomy and estimate associations between rates of bleeding and polyp characteristics.
Results: We analyzed data from 9 trials, comprising 71897 colorectal lesions (22.5% 20 mm or larger; 49.2% with proximal location). Clipping, compared with no clipping, did not significantly reduce the overall risk of postpolypectomy bleeding (2.2% with clipping vs 3.3% with no clipping; RR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-1.08; P = .072). Clipping significantly reduced risk of bleeding after removal of polyps that were 20 mm or larger (4.3% had bleeding after clipping vs 7.6% had bleeding with no clipping; RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.78; P = .020) or that were in a proximal location (3.0% had bleeding after clipping vs 6.2% had bleeding with no clipping; RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.81; P < .001). In multilevel metaregression analysis that adjusted for polyp size and location, prophylactic clipping was significantly associated with reduced risk of bleeding after removal of large proximal polyps (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.61; P = .021) but not small proximal lesions (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.48-1.62; P = .581).
Conclusions: In a meta-analysis of randomized trials, we found that routine use of prophylactic clipping does not reduce risk of postpolypectomy bleeding overall. However, clipping appeared to reduce bleeding after removal of large (more than 20 mm) proximal lesions.
Keywords: Colonoscopy; Comparison; Complication; PPB.
Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
When Evaluating the Benefit of Prophylactic Clipping Following Polypectomy, Not All of the Answers Are Found in Randomized Trials.Gastroenterology. 2021 Mar;160(4):1428-1429. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.080. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Gastroenterology. 2021. PMID: 32931785 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prevention of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding by prophylactic clipping after endoscopic colorectal polypectomy: a meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Oct;37(10):2229-2236. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04253-0. Epub 2022 Sep 29. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022. PMID: 36171411
-
The Role of Clips in Preventing Delayed Bleeding After Colorectal Polyp Resection: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):362-371.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 May 12. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 33991691
-
Prophylactic clipping after endoscopic mucosal resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: A meta-analysis.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;36(7):1778-1787. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15472. Epub 2021 Mar 3. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 33638894
-
Effect of prophylactic clip placement following endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal lesions on delayed polypectomy bleeding: A meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 May 14;25(18):2251-2263. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i18.2251. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31143075 Free PMC article.
-
Prophylactic clips to reduce delayed polypectomy bleeding after resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Apr;93(4):807-815. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 10. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021. PMID: 33049265
Cited by
-
Predictive Factors for Procedure Time for Closure of Mucosal Defect Following Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.JGH Open. 2025 May 7;9(5):e70174. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70174. eCollection 2025 May. JGH Open. 2025. PMID: 40336951 Free PMC article.
-
[Risk factors for delayed bleeding after intestinal polypectomy in children].Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jan 15;26(1):48-53. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2306060. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 38269459 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
American College of Gastroenterology-Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Management of Anticoagulants and Antiplatelets During Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding and the Periendoscopic Period.J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 17;5(2):100-101. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwac010. eCollection 2022 Apr. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35368325 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prophylactic clipping to prevent delayed colonic post-polypectomy bleeding: meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1251-1262. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08398-x. Epub 2021 Mar 9. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 33751224
-
Post-polypectomy colorectal bleeding: current strategies and the way forward.Clin Endosc. 2025 Mar;58(2):191-200. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.241. Epub 2024 Nov 27. Clin Endosc. 2025. PMID: 39722137 Free PMC article. Review.