Retest stability of the communication profile for the hearing impaired
- PMID: 3224770
- DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198810000-00002
Retest stability of the communication profile for the hearing impaired
Abstract
Retest stability of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired (CPHI) was assessed in a sample of 101 active-duty military personnel who attended the Aural Rehabilitation Program at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Pretests were administered by referring audiologists; retests were administered from 6 to 40 weeks later, at the beginning of the rehabilitation program. Mean scores on 5 of the 25 scales of the CPHI decreased significantly (p less than 0.01) over time, but the changes were small in magnitude (approximately -0.20). Distributions of retest-test differences were used to establish criteria for inferring significant improvement in scores over time. Retest correlations for scales in the communication environment, communication strategies, and personal adjustment areas ranged from 0.58 to 0.78. Communication performance and communication importance were less stable (r = 0.28 to 0.54). Retest correlations were comparable for short versus long retest intervals, but varied as a function of military rank. Implications of the results for clinical use of the CPHI are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Development of the communication profile for the hearing impaired.J Speech Hear Disord. 1987 May;52(2):129-43. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5202.129. J Speech Hear Disord. 1987. PMID: 3573744
-
Scale composition and item analysis of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired.J Speech Hear Res. 1986 Dec;29(4):515-35. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2904.535. J Speech Hear Res. 1986. PMID: 3795894
-
Factor structure of the communication profile for the hearing impaired.J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 Nov;54(4):541-9. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5404.541. J Speech Hear Disord. 1989. PMID: 2811335
-
Hospital referral and family adjustment in acquired deafness.Br J Audiol. 1983 Aug;17(3):175-81. doi: 10.3109/03005368309107882. Br J Audiol. 1983. PMID: 6357326 Review.
-
Effects of noise on speech recognition: Challenges for communication by service members.Hear Res. 2017 Jun;349:76-89. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 12. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 27743882 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the relation between audiometric and psychometric measures of hearing after tympanoplasty.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Mar;263(3):256-62. doi: 10.1007/s00405-005-0983-5. Epub 2005 Nov 3. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16267683
-
Effectiveness of an online SUpport PRogramme (SUPR) for older hearing aid users: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 20;7(5):e015012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015012. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28634259 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation - individual versus group (HEARING) trial: RCT design and baseline characteristics.BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec 15;9:233. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-233. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009. PMID: 20003515 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss.Trends Amplif. 2005;9(3):111-26. doi: 10.1177/108471380500900303. Trends Amplif. 2005. PMID: 16244758 Free PMC article.
-
The Effectiveness of a Vocational Enablement Protocol for Employees With Hearing Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517692304. doi: 10.1177/2331216517692304. Trends Hear. 2017. PMID: 29298599 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical