Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Aug:52:101312.
doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101312. Epub 2020 Mar 14.

Efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Gonzalo Labarca et al. Sleep Med Rev. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) commonly occurs in patients with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the preferred therapy for these patients. The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of CPAP for CV prevention in OSA patients. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two independent reviewers explored different databases and evaluated the risk of bias. Outcomes were defined as the relative risk (RR) of major CV events (MACEs), CV mortality, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, atrial fibrillation (Afrib) and heart failure. We performed both subgroup and meta-regression analyses by sleepiness status, adherence, and OSA severity. The certainty of evidence was rated according to GRADE. A total of 8 RCTs and 5817 participants were included. The results showed an RR of 0.87 (CI, 0.70-1.10) for MACEs, an RR of 0.94 (CI, 0.62-1.43) for CV mortality, an RR of 1.04 (CI, 0.79-1.37) for myocardial infarction, an RR of 1.05 (CI, 0.51-2.15) for unstable angina, an RR of 0.92 (CI, 0.68-1.23) for heart failure, an RR of 0.94 (CI, 0.71-1.26) for stroke, and an RR of 0.94 (CI, 0.54-1.64) for Afrib. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression revealed no effect on our proposed outcomes. Although there is no evidence that CPAP therapy improves CV outcomes, concerns regarding risk of bias, CPAP adherence, and the population included in each RCT may have reduced the strength of the findings to support the benefit in all patients, and future research exploring these relevant outcomes is needed. REVIEW REGISTER: PROSPERO CRD42019145803.

Keywords: CPAP; Cardiovascular; Meta-analysis; Obstructive; Sleep apnea.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources