Feature Detection and Biomechanical Analysis to Objectively Identify High Exposure Movement Strategies When Performing the EPIC Lift Capacity test
- PMID: 32248432
- DOI: 10.1007/s10926-020-09890-2
Feature Detection and Biomechanical Analysis to Objectively Identify High Exposure Movement Strategies When Performing the EPIC Lift Capacity test
Abstract
Purpose The Epic Lift Capacity (ELC) test is used to determine a worker's maximum lifting capacity. In the ELC test, maximum lifting capacity is often determined as the maximum weight lifted without exhibiting a visually appraised "high-risk workstyle." However, the criteria for evaluating lifting mechanics have limited justification. This study applies feature detection and biomechanical analysis to motion capture data obtained while participants performed the ELC test to objectively identify aspects of movement that may help define "high-risk workstyle". Method In this cross-sectional study, 24 participants completed the ELC test. We applied Principal Component Analysis, as a feature detection approach, and biomechanical analysis to motion capture data to objectively identify movement features related to biomechanical exposure on the low back and shoulders. Principal component scores were compared between high and low exposure trials (relative to median exposure) to determine if features of movement differed. Features were interpreted using single component reconstructions of principal components. Results Statistical testing showed that low exposure lifts and lowers maintained the body closer to the load, exhibited squat-like movement (greater knee flexion, wider base of support), and remained closer to neutral posture at the low back (less forward flexion and axial twist) and shoulder (less flexion and abduction). Conclusions Use of feature detection and biomechanical analyses revealed movement features related to biomechanical exposure at the low back and shoulders. The objectively identified criteria could augment the existing scoring criteria for ELC test technique assessment. In the future, such features can inform the design of classifiers to objectively identify "high-risk workstyle" in real-time.
Keywords: Automated pattern recognition; Kinematics; Kinetics; Lifting; Work capacity evaluation.
Similar articles
-
Understanding individual differences in lifting mechanics: Do some people adopt motor control strategies that minimize biomechanical exposure.Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Dec;74:102689. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102689. Epub 2020 Oct 29. Hum Mov Sci. 2020. PMID: 33130385
-
Is deep squat movement strategy related to floor-to-waist height lifting strategy: implications for physical employment testing.Ergonomics. 2020 Feb;63(2):152-162. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1689303. Epub 2019 Nov 12. Ergonomics. 2020. PMID: 31690241
-
Sex-based differences in lifting technique under increasing load conditions: A principal component analysis.Appl Ergon. 2016 May;54:186-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Jan 11. Appl Ergon. 2016. PMID: 26851478
-
Exploring lumbar and lower limb kinematics and kinetics for evidence that lifting technique is associated with LBP.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 21;16(7):e0254241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254241. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34288926 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Are there differences in lifting technique between those with and without low back pain? A systematic review.Scand J Pain. 2020 Apr 28;20(2):215-227. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0089. Scand J Pain. 2020. PMID: 31730537
Cited by
-
The Influence of Contextual and Theoretical Expertise on Generic and Occupation-Specific Lifting Strategy.Hum Factors. 2024 Dec;66(12):2590-2605. doi: 10.1177/00187208231223429. Epub 2024 Feb 1. Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 38299447 Free PMC article.
-
Muscle dynamics analysis by clustered categories during jogging in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Nov 28;24(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07000-w. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 38017430 Free PMC article.
-
Paramedics' Behavior Patterns When Transferring Non-Mobile Patients from the Ground to a Stretcher.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;13(6):611. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060611. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40150461 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics News Release; 2011.
-
- Armstrong TJ, Franzblau A, Haig A, Keyserling WM, Levine S, Streilein K, Ulin S, Werner R. Developing ergonomic solutions for prevention of musculoskeletal disorder disability. Assist Technol. 2001;13(2):878–877. - PubMed
-
- Pransky GS, Dempsey PG. Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14(3):217–229. - PubMed
-
- Epic Rehab. EPIC lift capacity test (ELC). 2016. https://epicrehab.com/products/index.php?main_page=document_general_info... .
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources