Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;31(1):50-62.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09890-2.

Feature Detection and Biomechanical Analysis to Objectively Identify High Exposure Movement Strategies When Performing the EPIC Lift Capacity test

Affiliations

Feature Detection and Biomechanical Analysis to Objectively Identify High Exposure Movement Strategies When Performing the EPIC Lift Capacity test

Daniel P Armstrong et al. J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose The Epic Lift Capacity (ELC) test is used to determine a worker's maximum lifting capacity. In the ELC test, maximum lifting capacity is often determined as the maximum weight lifted without exhibiting a visually appraised "high-risk workstyle." However, the criteria for evaluating lifting mechanics have limited justification. This study applies feature detection and biomechanical analysis to motion capture data obtained while participants performed the ELC test to objectively identify aspects of movement that may help define "high-risk workstyle". Method In this cross-sectional study, 24 participants completed the ELC test. We applied Principal Component Analysis, as a feature detection approach, and biomechanical analysis to motion capture data to objectively identify movement features related to biomechanical exposure on the low back and shoulders. Principal component scores were compared between high and low exposure trials (relative to median exposure) to determine if features of movement differed. Features were interpreted using single component reconstructions of principal components. Results Statistical testing showed that low exposure lifts and lowers maintained the body closer to the load, exhibited squat-like movement (greater knee flexion, wider base of support), and remained closer to neutral posture at the low back (less forward flexion and axial twist) and shoulder (less flexion and abduction). Conclusions Use of feature detection and biomechanical analyses revealed movement features related to biomechanical exposure at the low back and shoulders. The objectively identified criteria could augment the existing scoring criteria for ELC test technique assessment. In the future, such features can inform the design of classifiers to objectively identify "high-risk workstyle" in real-time.

Keywords: Automated pattern recognition; Kinematics; Kinetics; Lifting; Work capacity evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics News Release; 2011.
    1. Armstrong TJ, Franzblau A, Haig A, Keyserling WM, Levine S, Streilein K, Ulin S, Werner R. Developing ergonomic solutions for prevention of musculoskeletal disorder disability. Assist Technol. 2001;13(2):878–877. - PubMed
    1. Pransky GS, Dempsey PG. Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14(3):217–229. - PubMed
    1. Legge J, Burgess-Limerick R, Peeters G. A new pre-employment functional capacity evaluation predicts longer-term risk of musculoskeletal injury in healthy workers: a prospective cohort study. Spine. 2013;38(25):2208. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Epic Rehab. EPIC lift capacity test (ELC). 2016. https://epicrehab.com/products/index.php?main_page=document_general_info... .

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources