Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jun;83(6):e13242.
doi: 10.1111/aji.13242. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

Intrauterine perfusion immunotherapies in recurrent implantation failures: Systematic review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Intrauterine perfusion immunotherapies in recurrent implantation failures: Systematic review

Marcelo Borges Cavalcante et al. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Studies have investigated the gestational outcomes of new immunological therapies in the treatment of patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) in assisted reproductive technology (ART). The objective of this article is to assess the current state of evidence available in the literature on intrauterine perfusion immunotherapies in women undergoing ART treatments. By considering the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), the authors performed systematic review by searching the databases of PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus using the following key words: "recurrent implantation failure," "intrauterine infusion," "Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)," "Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)," "Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)," and "Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG)." The authors analyzed the indications and the impact of new immunological therapies with intrauterine infusions on the pregnancy outcomes of patients undergoing ART. PRP, PBMC, G-CSF, and hCG were the four most used immunological therapies with intrauterine infusion. These new therapies appear to improve the results of ART treatments in cases of RIF. However, the small number of studies does not allow definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of these therapies.

Keywords: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; human chorionic gonadotropin; intrauterine infusion; peripheral blood mononuclear cells; platelet-rich plasma; recurrent implantation failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Bashiri A, Halper KI, Orvieto R. Recurrent implantation failure-update overview on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and future directions. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):121-121.
    1. Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA. Impact of blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30(3):281-289.
    1. Franasiak JM, Scott RT. Contribution of immunology to implantation failure of euploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(6):1279-1283.
    1. Rubio C, Bellver J, Rodrigo L, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(5):1122-1129.
    1. Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Stecher A, Murtinger M, Vanderzwalmen P. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(8):1685-1695.

MeSH terms

Substances