Ustekinumab for the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis
- PMID: 32248659
- DOI: 10.1002/acr.24200
Ustekinumab for the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in giant cell arteritis (GCA).
Methods: We conducted a prospective, open-label trial of UST in patients with active new-onset or relapsing GCA. Active disease was defined as the presence of GCA symptoms and elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) level within 6 weeks of baseline. All patients received a 24-week prednisone taper and subcutaneous UST 90 mg at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44. The primary endpoint, prednisone-free remission, was defined as the absence of relapse through week 52 and normalization of the ESR and CRP level. Relapse was defined as the recurrence of GCA symptoms requiring treatment intensification. A sensitivity analysis excluding ESR/CRP level normalization from the prednisone-free remission definition was performed.
Results: The study enrolled 13 patients (target sample size 20). Enrollment was closed prematurely after 7 of the initial 10 patients relapsed. Five patients (39%) had new-onset disease. The initial prednisone doses were 20 mg (1 patient), 40 mg (9 patients), and 60 mg (3 patients). All patients entered disease remission within 4 weeks of baseline. Only 3 (23%) achieved the primary endpoint. Of the 10 patients (77%) who failed to achieve the primary endpoint, 7 relapsed after a mean period of 23 weeks. The remaining 3 patients met the alternative definition of prednisone-free remission that did not require ESR/CRP level normalization. One serious adverse event occurred.
Conclusion: UST combined with 24 weeks of prednisone was associated with a high rate of treatment failure in this prospective GCA trial.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02955147.
© 2020, American College of Rheumatology.
Comment in
-
Ustekinumab For the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis: Comment on the Article by Matza et al.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jul;73(7):1058-1059. doi: 10.1002/acr.24376. Epub 2021 Jun 4. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021. PMID: 32702165 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jul;73(7):1057-1058. doi: 10.1002/acr.24454. Epub 2021 Jun 4. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021. PMID: 32961035 No abstract available.
-
Ustekinumab in Giant Cell Arteritis: Comment on the Article by Matza et al.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jul;73(7):1056-1057. doi: 10.1002/acr.24457. Epub 2021 Jun 4. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021. PMID: 32961039 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jul;73(7):1059-1060. doi: 10.1002/acr.24378. Epub 2021 Jun 23. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021. PMID: 33161642 No abstract available.
References
-
- Buttgereit F, Dejaco C, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: a systematic review. JAMA 2016;315:2442-58.
-
- Soriano A, Muratore F, Pipitone N, Boiardi L, Cimino L, Salvarani C. Visual loss and other cranial ischaemic complications in giant cell arteritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2017;13:476-84.
-
- Garcia-Martinez A, Arguis P, Prieto-Gonzalez S, Espigol-Frigole G, Alba MA, Butjosa M, et al. Prospective long term follow-up of a cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis screened for aortic structural damage (aneurysm or dilatation). Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1826-32.
-
- Stone JH, Tuckwell K, Dimonaco S, Klearman M, Aringer M, Blockmans D, et al. Glucocorticoid dosages and acute-phase reactant levels at giant cell arteritis flare in a randomized trial of tocilizumab. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1329-38.
-
- Labarca C, Koster MJ, Crowson CS, Makol A, Ytterberg SR, Matteson EL, et al. Predictors of relapse and treatment outcomes in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: a retrospective cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55:347-56.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous