Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2019 Nov-Dec;71(6):427-430.
doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.02.001.

Cardiac devices and cyber attacks: How far are they real? How to overcome?

Affiliations
Editorial

Cardiac devices and cyber attacks: How far are they real? How to overcome?

Aditya Kapoor et al. Indian Heart J. 2019 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) include bradycardia pacemakers, defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. These devices are proven to save lives and improve quality of life in indicated patients. Recent advances in CIED technology allow interrogating and transmitting data stored in these devices wirelessly through radiofrequency or Bluetooth technology and more recently through smartphones.1 Remote monitoring of CIED uses telemetry and IP connectivity to transmit data from devices to the cloud and eventually to hospitals/clinics monitoring them. There has been overwhelming evidence in support of remote monitoring of CIEDs, improving patient outcomes, survival, and hospitalization.2 Therefore, guidelines recommend remote monitoring for all CIEDs.3 Remote monitoring allows frequent checks reducing clinic visits, improving efficiency of medical resources and timely intervention in patients with clinical events. Although internet of things (IOT) dependency is increasing, advantages of connectivity and data transfer come with a price of hacking, resulting in malfunction of computers, misuse of stolen data, or medical extortion. Therefore, cybersecurity has become a necessity in this digital world. Medical devices using net connectivity expose themselves to cyber attacks. Fortunately so far no hacking or cyber attack has been reported in patients with CIEDs, and most literature focuses on proof of concept and in-the-research laboratory scenarios. Although documented clinical events have not yet happened, the threat is real. It is essential to be well prepared for this potential but serious threat. It is imperative that device manufacturers, regulatory bodies, medical professionals, and patients all work together to prevent, identify, and mitigate cyber threat.

Keywords: CIED; Cybersecurity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Martignani Cristian. Cybersecurity in cardiac implantable electronic devices. Expet Rev Med Dev. 2019;16(6):437–444. - PubMed
    1. Maisel William H., Paulsen Jessica E., Hazelett Matthew B., Selzman Kimberly A. Striking the right balance when addressing cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(7):e69–e70. - PubMed
    1. Slotwiner David, Varma Niraj, Akar Joseph G. Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(7):e69–e100. - PubMed
    1. Baranchuk Adrian, Refaat Marwan M., Patton Kristen K. Cybersecurity for cardiac implantable electronic devices. What should you know? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(11):1284–1288. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ricci Linda, Paulsen Jessica, Browning Stephen. An overview of the security of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40:911–912. - PubMed

Publication types