Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 29:S0022-5223(20)30518-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.079. Online ahead of print.

Clinical outcomes of microscopic residual disease after bronchial sleeve resection for non-small cell lung cancer

Affiliations
Free article

Clinical outcomes of microscopic residual disease after bronchial sleeve resection for non-small cell lung cancer

Tae Hee Hong et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. .
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the significance of microscopic residual disease (MRD) at the bronchial resection margin after bronchial sleeve resection in non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 536 consecutive patients who underwent bronchial sleeve resection between 1995 and 2015. Clinical outcomes, including recurrence and long-term survival, were analyzed according to the bronchial resection margin status (R0 = complete resection and R1 = microscopic residual tumor).

Results: Forty patients (7.5%) were identified to have MRD. During a 52.4-month follow-up (range, 0.1-261.0 months), there was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (61.8% vs 61.5%; P = .550) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (53.7% vs 59.0%; P = .390) between groups R1 and R0. Multivariable cox regression analysis demonstrated that the margin status (group R1) was not associated with significantly decreased overall survival and recurrence-free survival. In group R1, 3 patients (7.5%) showed locoregional recurrence, including 1 patient (2.5%) with anastomotic recurrence. There were no significant differences between both groups in anastomotic recurrence (2.5% vs 2.6%; P = 1.000), locoregional recurrence (7.5% vs 12.7%; P = .476), and distant recurrence (25.0% vs 23.2%; P = .947) rates. Subgroup analysis of group R1 revealed a significant trend toward an increasing recurrence rate as the pathological extent of MRD advanced toward invasive extramucosal carcinoma (P for trend = .015).

Conclusions: In our experience of bronchial sleeve resection, the oncologic outcome of MRD was not jeopardized. Furthermore, the pathological extent of MRD might be helpful for recurrence prediction and treatment planning.

Keywords: lung cancer; microscopic residual disease; sleeve lobectomy; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources