Relationship of aortic bifurcation with sacropelvic anatomy: Application to anterior lumbar interbody fusion
- PMID: 32249448
- DOI: 10.1002/ca.23598
Relationship of aortic bifurcation with sacropelvic anatomy: Application to anterior lumbar interbody fusion
Abstract
Introduction: Various sacropelvic parameters such as the pelvic Incidence (PI) are used to predict ideal lumbar lordosis and aid surgical planning. The objective of this study was to establish the relationship between the location of the aortic bifurcation from the sacral promontory and sacropelvic measures including the PI.
Materials and methods: One hundred sixty five computed tomography (CT) scans obtained for major trauma including the entire spine were identified. Sacropelvic parameters including PI, sacral anatomic orientation, pelvic thickness (PTH), and sacral table angle were measured. Aortic bifurcation was identified on sagittal and coronal imaging and the distance from the sacral promontory (bifurcation-promontory distance [BPD]) measured (mm).
Results: Mean age of the cohort was 44.3 years (SD 18.5; range 16-88 years); 61.8% male. The mean PI was 49.2° (SD 10.2°; range 30°-80°). The mean BPD was 66.4 mm (SD 13.1 mm; range 38.3-100 mm). In the majority, the bifurcation was at the level of the L4 vertebral body (72.7%). Only age (r = -.389; p < .0001) and PTH (r = .172; p = .027) correlated with the BPD to a significant degree. PI did not correlate with BPD (r = .061; p = .435). Linear regression analysis provided the following predictive equation: BPD = 34.3 mm + 0.30 × PTH.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates a lack of any meaningful correlation between sagittal pelvic parameters and the distance of the aortic bifurcation from the sacral promontory. Surgical planning for fusion surgery in the lumbar spine should include assessment of spinopelvic parameters and if anterior access to the lumbar disc(s) necessary, vascular anatomy should be carefully assessed independent of these measures.
Keywords: abdominal aorta; lumbar vertebrae; pelvic bone.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Pelvic Incidence: Computed Tomography Study Evaluating Correlation with Sagittal Sacropelvic Parameters.Clin Anat. 2020 Mar;33(2):237-244. doi: 10.1002/ca.23478. Epub 2019 Oct 9. Clin Anat. 2020. PMID: 31576613
-
Correlation of patient age with CT-measured aorta-sacral promontory distance.Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jun;26(6):887-91. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2621-5. Epub 2015 Jan 30. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. PMID: 25634664
-
Computed tomography analysis of sacropelvic parameters in relation to anterior access to the lumbosacral disc.Br J Neurosurg. 2020 Jun;34(3):299-304. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1736262. Epub 2020 Mar 10. Br J Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 32153212
-
A review of methods for evaluating the quantitative parameters of sagittal pelvic alignment.Spine J. 2012 May;12(5):433-46. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Apr 4. Spine J. 2012. PMID: 22480531 Review.
-
Origin of median sacral artery with fourth pair of lumbar artery - an alert for spine surgeons and interventionalists: A case report and mini literature review.Folia Med Cracov. 2024 Sep 15;64(2):63-68. doi: 10.24425/fmc.2024.150152. Folia Med Cracov. 2024. PMID: 39324678 Review.
Cited by
-
Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Techniques, Pearls and Pitfalls.Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):730-741. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0485. Epub 2020 Oct 14. Asian Spine J. 2020. PMID: 33108838 Free PMC article.
-
Is there a variance in complication types associated with ALIF approaches? A systematic review.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Nov;163(11):2991-3004. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-05000-0. Epub 2021 Sep 21. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021. PMID: 34546435 Free PMC article.
-
Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Osteobiologics for Lumbar Fusion.Asian Spine J. 2022 Dec;16(6):1022-1033. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0435. Epub 2022 Dec 27. Asian Spine J. 2022. PMID: 36573302 Free PMC article.
-
The Relationship Between the Distance of Common Iliac Artery Bifurcation to the Sacral Promontory and Sacropelvic Parameters: Implications for Sacropexy Operations.Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06176-0. Online ahead of print. Int Urogynecol J. 2025. PMID: 40586913
-
Sacropelvic Parameters and L5 Spondylolysis: Computed Tomography Analysis.Asian Spine J. 2022 Feb;16(1):66-74. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0442. Epub 2021 Mar 11. Asian Spine J. 2022. PMID: 33687859 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Agrawal, A., Abayazeed, A., Francis, S. L., Tolentino, J., Ostergard, D. R., Seow, A., … Azadi, A. (2015). Correlation of patient age with CT-measured aorta-sacral promontory distance. International Urogynecology Journal, 26, 887-891.
-
- Arima, H., Dimar, J. R., 2nd, Glassman, S. D., Yamato, Y., Matsuyama, Y., Mac-Thiong, J. M., … Carreon, L. Y. (2018). Differences in lumbar and pelvic parameters among African American, Caucasian and Asian populations. European Spine Journal, 27, 2990-2998.
-
- Asha, M. J., Choksey, M. S., Shad, A., Roberts, P., & Imray, C. (2012). The role of the vascular surgeon in anterior lumbar spine surgery. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 26, 499-503.
-
- Baker, J. F., Don, A. S., & Robertson, P. A. (2020). Pelvic incidence: Computed tomography study evaluating correlation with sagittal sacropelvic parameters. Clinical Anatomy, 33, 237-244.
-
- Barrey, C., Ene, B., Louis-Tisserand, G., Montagna, P., Perrin, G., & Simon, E. (2013). Vascular anatomy in the lumbar spine investigated by three-dimensional computed tomography angiography: The concept of vascular window. World Neurosurgery, 79, 784-791.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous