Comparison of endoscopic bilateral metal stent drainage with plastic stents in the palliation of unresectable hilar biliary malignant strictures: Large multicenter study
- PMID: 32249460
- DOI: 10.1111/den.13680
Comparison of endoscopic bilateral metal stent drainage with plastic stents in the palliation of unresectable hilar biliary malignant strictures: Large multicenter study
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic stenting to manage malignant hilar biliary obstruction has no consensus regarding the optimal stenting strategy. In this multicenter study, we compared transpapillary parallel-style bilateral metal stenting with bilateral plastic stenting, and evaluated short- and long-term outcomes.
Methods: We recruited 262 consecutive patients (Bismuth classification types II-IV) who underwent either bilateral metal or plastic stenting as primary therapy at four tertiary centers. To overcome selection bias, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching. Our primary outcome was overall survival.
Results: After propensity score matching, each group comprised 96 patients, with no significant differences in any baseline characteristics. The median survival was significantly longer in the metal stenting group than in the plastic stenting group (7.2 months [95% CI 6.0-8.5] vs. 4.1 months [95% CI 2.9-5.3]; P = 0.015). The clinical success rates were significantly higher in the metal stenting group than in the plastic stenting group (99.0% vs. 71.9%, respectively; P < 0.001), and lower post-procedure cholangitis incidence (7.3% vs. 26.0%; P < 0.001), longer median symptom-free stent patency (9.2 months [95% CI 7.6-10.6] vs. 4.8 months [95% CI 4.2-5.3]; P < 0.001), and fewer total interventions (1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 2.0 ± 1.4; P < 0.001). In multivariate Cox analysis of the overall survival, metal stenting (HR 0.589, P = 0.002), hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HR 0.419, P = 0.009), and adjuvant treatment (HR 0.596, P = 0.006) were independent predictors of death.
Conclusions: Endoscopic therapy using bilateral metal stenting is superior to bilateral plastic stenting, with prolonged overall survival, higher clinical success, and longer stent patency in patients with advanced hilar biliary malignancies.
Keywords: bile duct neoplasms; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; overall survival; propensity score matching; self-expandable metal stent; stent.
© 2020 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.
References
-
- Launois B, Reding R, Lebeau G et al. Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: French experience in a collective survey of 552 extrahepatic bile duct cancers. J. Hepatobiliary. Pancreat. Surg. 2000; 7: 128-34.
-
- Cheng JL, Bruno MJ, Bergman JJ et al. Endoscopic palliation of patients with biliary obstruction caused by nonresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: efficacy of self-expandable metallic Wallstents. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 56: 33-9.
-
- Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated October 2017. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 910-30.
-
- Mukai T, Yasuda I, Nakashima M et al. Metallic stents are more efficacious than plastic stents in unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures: a randomized controlled trial. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2013; 20: 214-22.
-
- Perdue DG, Freeman ML, DiSario JA et al. Plastic versus self-expanding metallic stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2008; 42: 1040-6.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical